Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 514

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physiological cross‐sectional area of human leg muscles based on magnetic resonance imaging

Fukunaga, T., Roy, R. R., Shellock, F. G., Hodgson, J. A., Day, M. K., Lee, P. L., Kwong‐Fu, H., Edgerton, V. R.·1992·Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging techniques were used to determine the physiological cross‐sectional areas (PCSAs) of the major muscles or muscle groups of the lower leg. For 12 healthy subjects, the boundaries of each muscle or muscle group were digitized from images taken at 1‐cm intervals along the length of the leg. Muscle volumes were calculated from the summation of each anatomical CSA (ACSA) and the distance between each section. Muscle length was determined as the distance between the most proximal and distal images in which the muscle was visible. The PCSA of each muscle was calculated as muscle volume times the cosine of the angle of fiber pinnation divided by fiber length, where published fiber length:muscle length ratios were used to estimate fiber lengths. The mean volumes of the major plantarflexors were 489, 245, and 140 cm 3 for the soleus and medial (MG) and lateral (LG) heads of the gastrocnemius. The mean PCSA of the soleus was 230 cm 2, about three and eight times larger than the MG (68 cm 2) and LG (28 cm 2), respectively. These PCSA values were eight (soleus), four (MG), and three (LG) times larger than their respective maximum ACSA. The major dorsiflexor, the tibialis anterior (TA), had a muscle volume of 143 cm 2, a PCSA of 19 cm 2, and an ACSA of 9 cm 2. With the exception of the soleus, the mean fiber length of all subjects was closely related to muscle volume across muscles. The soleus fibers were unusually short relative to the muscle volume, thus potentiating its force potential. Using the relationship between PCSA and fiber length to represent the maximum force‐velocity potential of a muscle and assuming a similar moment arm, the soleus, MG, and LG would be expected to produce ±71, 22, and 7% of the force and 54, 30, and 16% of the power of the major plantarflexors. These data illustrate some of the major limitations in the use of ACSA measurements to predict the functional properties of a muscle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jor.1100100623

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 514

Metadata

Authors
Fukunaga, T., Roy, R. R., Shellock, F. G., Hodgson, J. A., Day, M. K., Lee, P. L., Kwong‐Fu, H., & Edgerton, V. R.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-11
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
926-934
ISSN
  • 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-527X
OpenAlex
W2026905157
Cited by
514
References
2
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiological cross‐sectional area of human leg muscles based on magnetic resonance imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.1100100623
The paper
Fukunaga, T., Roy, R. R., Shellock, F. G., Hodgson, J. A., Day, M. K., Lee, P. L., Kwong‐Fu, H., & Edgerton, V. R. (1992). Physiological cross‐sectional area of human leg muscles based on magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100100623

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.