Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Antimicrobial activity of platelet‐leukocyte gel against Staphylococcus aureus

Open access
Moojen, Dirk Jan F., Everts, Peter A.M., Schure, Rose‐Minke, Overdevest, Ed P., van Zundert, André, Knape, Johannes T.A., Castelein, René M., Creemers, Laura B., Dhert, Wouter J.A.·2008·Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Abstract

Platelet‐leukocyte gel (PLG) contains high concentrations of platelets and leukocytes. As leukocytes play an important role in the innate host‐defense, we hypothesized that PLG might have antimicrobial properties. This study investigated the antimicrobial activity of PLG against Staphylococcus aureus and the contribution of myeloperoxidase (MPO), present in leukocytes, in this process. Platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) and platelet‐poor plasma (PPP) were obtained from whole blood of six donors. PLG was prepared by mixing PRP with autologous (PLG‐AT) or bovine thrombin (PLG‐BT). Antimicrobial activity of PLG‐AT, PLG‐BT, PRP, and PPP was determined in a bacterial kill assay. MPO release was measured by ELISA and activity was measured using a MPO activity assay. Cultures showed a rapid decrease in the number of bacteria for both PLG‐AT and PLG‐BT, which was maximal between 4 and 8 h, to approximately 1% of the bacteria in controls. The effect of PLG‐AT was largest and significantly different compared to PRP (p = 0.004) and PPP (p < 0.001), however not compared to PLG‐BT (p = 0.093). PLG‐AT, PLG‐BT, and PRP showed a comparable, gradually increasing MPO release. MPO activity was comparable for all groups and remained stable. No correlation between MPO release, activity, and bacterial kill could be found. PLG appears to have potent antimicrobial capacity, but the role of MPO in this activity is questionable. PLG might represent a useful strategy against postoperative infections. However, additional research should elucidate its exact antimicrobial activity. © 2007 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 26:404–410, 2008

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jor.20519

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 298

Metadata

Authors
Moojen, D. J. F., Everts, P. A. M., Schure, R., Overdevest, E. P., van Zundert, A., Knape, J. T. A., Castelein, R. M., Creemers, L. B., & Dhert, W. J. A.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10-24
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
404-410
ISSN
  • 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-527X
OpenAlex
W2043647716
Cited by
298
References
0
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial activity of platelet‐leukocyte gel against Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.20519
The paper
Moojen, D. J. F., Everts, P. A. M., Schure, R., Overdevest, E. P., van Zundert, A., Knape, J. T. A., Castelein, R. M., Creemers, L. B., & Dhert, W. J. A. (2008). Antimicrobial activity of platelet‐leukocyte gel against Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20519

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.