The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In situ measurement of transport between subchondral bone and articular cartilage
Open accessAbstract
Subchondral bone and articular cartilage play complementary roles in load bearing of the joints. Although the biomechanical coupling between subchondral bone and articular cartilage is well established, it remains unclear whether direct biochemical communication exists between them. Previously, the calcified cartilage between these two compartments was generally believed to be impermeable to transport of solutes and gases. However, recent studies found that small molecules could penetrate into the calcified cartilage from the subchondral bone. To quantify the real‐time solute transport across the calcified cartilage, we developed a novel imaging method based on fluorescence loss induced by photobleaching (FLIP). Diffusivity of sodium fluorescein (376 Da) was quantified to be 0.07 ± 0.03 and 0.26 ± 0.22 µm 2/s between subchondral bone and calcified cartilage and within the calcified cartilage in the murine distal femur, respectively. Electron microscopy revealed that calcified cartilage matrix contained nonmineralized regions (∼22% volume fraction) that are either large patches (53 ± 18 nm) among the mineral deposits or numerous small regions (4.5 ± 0.8 nm) within the mineral deposits, which may serve as transport pathways. These results suggest that there exists a possible direct signaling between subchondral bone and articular cartilage, and they form a functional unit with both mechanical and biochemical interactions, which may play a role in the maintenance and degeneration of the joint. © 2009 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 27:1347–1352, 2009
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice
Bijlsma, J. W., Berenbaum, F., & Lafeber, F. P. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60243-2 · Cited by 2,288
Goldring, S. R., & Goldring, M. B. (2016) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2016.148 · Cited by 896
The basic science of the subchondral bone
Madry, H., van Dijk, C. N., & Mueller‐Gerbl, M. (2010) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-010-1054-z · Cited by 615
The bone–cartilage unit in osteoarthritis
Lories, R. J., & Luyten, F. P. (2011) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2010.197 · Cited by 608
Biomaterials for articular cartilage tissue engineering: Learning from biology
Armiento, A. R., Stoddart, M. J., Alini, M., & Eglin, D. (2018) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.021 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Pan, J., Zhou, X., Li, W., Novotny, J. E., Doty, S. B., & Wang, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1347-1352
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W2060693812
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In situ measurement of transport between subchondral bone and articular cartilage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.20883
- The paper
- Pan, J., Zhou, X., Li, W., Novotny, J. E., Doty, S. B., & Wang, L. (2009). In situ measurement of transport between subchondral bone and articular cartilage. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20883
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.