Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biofilm dispersal of community‐associated methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus on orthopedic implant material

Open access
Lauderdale, Katherine J., Malone, Cheryl L., Boles, Blaise R., Morcuende, Jose, Horswill, Alexander R.·2010·Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Abstract

Orthopedic implant‐related bacterial infections are associated with high morbidity that may lead to limb amputation and exert significant financial burden on the healthcare system. Staphylococcus aureus is a dominant cause of these infections, and increased incidence of community‐associated methicillin‐resistant S. aureus (CA‐MRSA) is being reported. The ability of S. aureus to attach to the foreign body surface and develop a biofilm is an important determinant of resistance to antibiotic prophylaxis. To gain insight on CA‐MRSA biofilm properties, USA300 biofilm maturation and dispersal was examined, and these biofilms were found to exhibit pronounced, quorum‐sensing mediated dispersal from a glass surface. For comparison of biofilm maturation on different surface chemistries, USA300 biofilm growth was examined on glass, polycarbonate, and titanium, and minimal differences were apparent in thickness, total biomass, and substratum coverage. Importantly, USA300 biofilms grown on titanium possessed a functional dispersal mechanism, and the dispersed cells regained susceptibility to rifampicin and levofloxacin treatment. The titanium biofilms were also sensitive to proteinase K and DNaseI, suggesting the matrix is composed of proteinaceous material and extracellular DNA. These studies provide new insights on the properties of CA‐MRSA biofilms on implant materials, and indicate that quorum‐sensing dispersion could be an effective therapeutic strategy. © 2009 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 28:55–61, 2010

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jor.20943

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Lauderdale, K. J., Malone, C. L., Boles, B. R., Morcuende, J., & Horswill, A. R.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-16
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
55-61
ISSN
  • 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-527X
OpenAlex
W2159617230
Cited by
213
References
3
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biofilm dispersal of community‐associated methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus on orthopedic implant material. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.20943
The paper
Lauderdale, K. J., Malone, C. L., Boles, B. R., Morcuende, J., & Horswill, A. R. (2010). Biofilm dispersal of community‐associated methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus on orthopedic implant material. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20943

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.