The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining the phenotype of young healthy nucleus pulposus cells: Recommendations of the Spine Research Interest Group at the 2014 annual ORS meeting
Open accessAbstract
Low back pain is a major physical and socioeconomic problem. Degeneration of the intervertebral disc and especially that of nucleus pulposus (NP) has been linked to low back pain. In spite of much research focusing on the NP, consensus among the research community is lacking in defining the NP cell phenotype. A consensus agreement will allow easier distinguishing of NP cells from annulus fibrosus (AF) cells and endplate chondrocytes, a better gauge of therapeutic success, and a better guidance of tissue‐engineering‐based regenerative strategies that attempt to replace lost NP tissue. Most importantly, a clear definition will further the understanding of physiology and function of NP cells, ultimately driving development of novel cell‐based therapeutic modalities. The Spine Research Interest Group at the 2014 Annual ORS Meeting in New Orleans convened with the task of compiling a working definition of the NP cell phenotype with hope that a consensus statement will propel disc research forward into the future. Based on evaluation of recent studies describing characteristic NP markers and their physiologic relevance, we make the recommendation of the following healthy NP phenotypic markers: stabilized expression of HIF‐1α, GLUT‐1, aggrecan/collagen II ratio >20, Shh, Brachyury, KRT18/19, CA12, and CD24. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 33:???–???, 2015.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses
Vogel, C., & Marcotte, E. M. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3185 · Cited by 4,195
A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain
Hoy, D., Bain, C., Williams, G., March, L., Brooks, P., Blyth, F., Woolf, A., Vos, T., & Buchbinder, R. (2012) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.34347 · Cited by 3,005
Role of cytokines in intervertebral disc degeneration: pain and disc content
Risbud, M. V., & Shapiro, I. M. (2014) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2013.160 · Cited by 1,767
Self-citationLumbar Disc Disorders and Low-Back Pain: Socioeconomic Factors and Consequences
Katz, J. N. (2006) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.e.01273 · Cited by 1,645
Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems
Martin, B. I. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.6.656 · Cited by 1,531
Oxygen Sensing, Hypoxia-Inducible Factors, and Disease Pathophysiology
Semenza, G. L. (2014) · Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-012513-104720 · Cited by 1,159
Antoniou, J., Steffen, T., Nelson, F., Winterbottom, N., Hollander, A. P., Poole, R. A., Aebi, M., & Alini, M. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci118884 · Cited by 1,045
Nerve ingrowth into diseased intervertebral disc in chronic back pain
Freemont, A., Peacock, T., Goupille, P., Hoyland, J., O'Brien, J., & Jayson, M. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)02135-1 · Cited by 989
Self-citationBiology of Intervertebral Disc Aging and Degeneration: Involvement of the Extracellular Matrix
Roughley, P. J. (2004) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000146101.53784.b1 · Cited by 779
Matrix synthesis and degradation in human intervertebral disc degeneration
Le Maitre, C. L., Pockert, A., Buttle, D. J., Freemont, A. J., & Hoyland, J. A. (2007) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst0350652 · Cited by 515
Self-citation
Cited by
Mitophagy in degenerative joint diseases
Sun, K., Jing, X., Guo, J., Yao, X., & Guo, F. (2021) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1822097 · Cited by 459
Novais, E. J., Tran, V. A., Johnston, S. N., Darris, K. R., Roupas, A. J., Sessions, G. A., Shapiro, I. M., Diekman, B. O., & Risbud, M. V. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25453-2 · Cited by 440
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Risbud, M. V., Schoepflin, Z. R., Mwale, F., Kandel, R. A., Grad, S., Iatridis, J. C., Sakai, D., & Hoyland, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-01-21
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 283-293
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W1817479092
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 13.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining the phenotype of young healthy nucleus pulposus cells: Recommendations of the Spine Research Interest Group at the 2014 annual ORS meeting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.22789
- The paper
- Risbud, M. V., Schoepflin, Z. R., Mwale, F., Kandel, R. A., Grad, S., Iatridis, J. C., Sakai, D., & Hoyland, J. A. (2015). Defining the phenotype of young healthy nucleus pulposus cells: Recommendations of the Spine Research Interest Group at the 2014 annual ORS meeting. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22789
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.