Cited by 17Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Health and Care UtilizationDental Research and COVID-19

Periodontal health education session can improve oral hygiene in patients with gingivitis: A masked randomized controlled clinical study

Gunpinar, Sadiye, Meraci, Bilge·2022·Journal of Periodontology

Abstract

Background: The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of a periodontal health education session (PHES), which included education on the pathogenesis and consequences of periodontal diseases on oral hygiene motivation in patients with gingivitis. Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 50 (26 females and 24 males) patients with gingivitis who underwent periodontal treatment. Subjects were randomly allocated into the PHES group (experimental group) and standard oral hygiene education group (control group). The Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI) and Papillary Bleeding Index (PBI) were used to evaluate oral hygiene at baseline and were repeated after 1, 3, and 6 months. Knowledge about periodontal disease was measured and the participants’ motivation was determined using the Oral Hygiene Motivation Scale. Results: Although baseline knowledge levels and motivation scores were not different between the groups, following the educational motivational interviewing (MI) session, levels were higher in the experimental compared with the control group. The subjects’ RMNPI and PBI scores at the 1‐, 3‐, and 6‐ month re‐examinations were statistically higher in the control group than the experimental group. Furthermore, the level of knowledge and intrinsic and total motivation scores were moderately positively correlated with a reduction in clinical indices at 6 months compared with baseline. Conclusions: The results of this study indicated that increased knowledge and awareness about periodontal diseases and its consequences, including systemic effects, via educational MI session increased intrinsic motivation and improved oral hygiene of patients with gingivitis, especially regarding interproximal surfaces.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jper.21-0034

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gunpinar, S., & Meraci, B.
Affiliations
Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University (TR)
Corresponding author
Gunpinar, Sadiye
Venue
Journal of Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-06-15
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
220-230
ISSN
  • 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3670
OpenAlex
W3165848510
Cited by
17
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Periodontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
Keywords
gingivitis, oral hygiene, motivational interviewing, patient motivation, plaque index, bleeding on probing, interproximal plaque, periodontal treatment
MeSH terms
Dental Plaque, Dental Plaque Index, Female, Gingivitis, Health Education, Humans, Male, Oral Hygiene, Periodontal Diseases, Toothbrushing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review