Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of the apoplast in aluminium toxicity and resistance of higher plants: A review

Horst, Walter J.·1995·Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde

Abstract

In acid mineral soils excess of aluminium ions (AI) is one of the most important factors determining plant species and ecotype distribution, and limiting growth and yield of crops. Aluminium preferentially accumulates in the root tips as sites of cell division and cell elongation. Whether inhibition of cell‐division rate is due to direct interaction of Al with the chromatin in the nuclei is rather questionable because of the low radial mobility of Al in the root and the rapidity of cessation of root elongation after Al addition to the growth medium. Externally applied Al instantaneously binds to binding sites in the apoplast. Cross binding of pectates by Al may affect extensibility and water permeability of the cell wall. Interaction of Al with other cell‐wall constituents is most likely but needs clarification. Aluminium also affects plasma‐membrane characteristics. Ca 2+ influx and K+ efflux are inhibited, and synthesis of callose is induced. Induction of callose suggests an increase rather than a decrease in cytosolic Ca 2+ as initial response to Al. There is little evidence suggesting major disruption of plasma membrane and cytoplasmic functions by AI. K+ uptake, H+ extrusion, Fe(III) reducing capacity and lipid peroxidation are hardly affected even in roots severely inhibited in elongation by Al. Al uptake and physiological/biochemical effects of Al on intact plant roots can be mimicked even more sensitively using cell suspension cultures which, therefore, represent a powerful tool for the study of Al toxicity. Large differences in Al resistance exist between plant species and cultivars of a species. Root elongation‐rate and callose formation can be used as indicators for Al injury. Since short term Al injury is mainly expressed in the apoplast. Al resistance requires exclusion of Al from or/and inactivation of Al in the apoplast. Generally, Al‐resistant genotypes are characterized by lower Al accumulation of the root apical meristems. This is achieved by a lower cation‐exchange capacity/surface negativity or complexation of Al through root exudates (mucilage, organic acids). Long term exposure of plants to Al also inhibits shoot growth via induction of nutrient (Mg, Ca, P) deficiencies, drought stress and phytohormone imbalances. Such longer term effects have to be taken into consideration when selecting genotypes for high yielding capacity on acid soils high in available Al.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jpln.19951580503

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
Horst, W. J.
Venue
Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-01
Volume
158
Issue
5
Pages
419-428
ISSN
0044-3263 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997333538
Cited by
342
References
44
FWCI
11.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of the apoplast in aluminium toxicity and resistance of higher plants: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jpln.19951580503
The paper
Horst, W. J. (1995). The role of the apoplast in aluminium toxicity and resistance of higher plants: A review. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.19951580503

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.