The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Farmer-led maize biochar trials: effect on crop yield and soil nutrients under conservation farming
Abstract
Abstract In extensive farmer‐led trials practicing conservation farming (CF) in three regions of Zambia (Mongu: sandy soils; Kaoma: sandy or loamy sand soils; Mkushi: sandy loam or loamy soils), we studied the effects of biochar made of maize cobs (0, 2, and 6 t ha−1corresponding to 0, 0.8, and 2.5% per basin) at different fertilizer rates of NPK and urea on crop yield of maize (Zea mays) and groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea). Conservation farming in this case combines minimum tillage (how basins), crop rotation and residue retention. For the first time, the effect of biochar onin situsoil nutrient supply rates [determined by buried Plant Root Simulator (PRS™) exchange resins] was studied, as well as the effects of biochar on elemental composition of maize. Effects of 0–10% (w:w) biochar addition on soil physical and soil chemical properties were determined in the laboratory. At all sites there was a consistent positive response in crop yield upon the addition of biochar. However, due to a great variability between farms there were no significant differences in absolute yields between the treatments. In the sandy soils at Mongu, relative yields (i.e., percentage yield with biochar relative to the same fertilizer rate without biochar) of maize grains and maize stover were significantly increased at recommended fertilizer rates (232 ± 60%) and at half the recommended rate (128 ± 6%), respectively. In addition, biochar significantly increased concentrations of K and P in maize stover.In situsoil nutrient supply rates as measured by PRS™‐probes were highly spatially variable with no consistent effects of the different treatments in the three regions. By contrast, the fraction of plant available water (Vol.‐%) significantly increased upon the addition of biochar in all three soils. The increase caused by 10% biochar addition was of factor 2.5 in Mongu (from 4.5% to 11.2%) and 1.2 in both Kaoma (from 14.7% to 18.2%) and Mkushi (from 18.2% to 22.7%). Cation exchange capacity, pH, and exchangeable K significantly increased upon the addition of 10% (w:w) biochar in all three regions with a subsequent increase in base saturation and decrease of available Al3+. Our findings suggest that the addition of biochar in combination with CF might have a positive impact on crop growth and that this positive effect is mainly caused by increases in plant‐available water and decreased available Al.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“With regard to soil physical properties, biochar addition improved soil water holding capacity (WHC) and plant available water (PAW) in both loamy and sandy loam soils (Bruun et al., 2014;Dugan et al., 2010;Martinsen et al., 2014).”
From Biochar improves maize growth by alleviation of nutrient stress in a moderately acidic low-input Nepalese soil (2018) · cites this paper as Martinsen et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“A significant positive relationship between maize biomass production and K supply rates (Supplementary Fig. 4d), combined with previous observations that K is the main nutrient added by the addition of biochar (Martinsen et al., 2014), indicated that the K addition via biochar contributed to the alleviation of nutrient stress by biochar.”
From Biochar improves maize growth by alleviation of nutrient stress in a moderately acidic low-input Nepalese soil (2018) · cites this paper as Martinsen et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“Similar trend (an increase of PAW from 18.2% to 22.3%) was reported by Martinsen et al. (2014) upon biochar addition (10% vol.) in the same soil.”
From Biochar improves maize growth by alleviation of nutrient stress in a moderately acidic low-input Nepalese soil (2018) · cites this paper as Martinsen et al. (2014)
Citations
Cites
Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter
Nelson, D. W., & Sommers, L. E. (1996) · Soil Science Society of America book series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c34 · Cited by 13,048
Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter
Nelson, D. W., & Sommers, L. E. (1982) · Agronomy monograph/Agronomy · doi:10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c29 · Cited by 10,032
Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property
Schmidt, M. W. I., Torn, M. S., Abiven, S., Dittmar, T., Guggenberger, G., Janssens, I. A., Kleber, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Lehmann, J., Manning, D. A. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10386 · Cited by 6,057
Bremner, J. M., & Mulvaney, C. S. (1982) · Agronomy monograph/Agronomy · doi:10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c31 · Cited by 5,651
Biochar effects on soil biota – A review
Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C., & Crowley, D. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022 · Cited by 5,074
Marschner's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants
Marschner, P., & Marschner, P. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-63043-9 · Cited by 4,582
Glaser, B., Lehmann, J., & Zech, W. (2002) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4 · Cited by 2,890 · cited 9×
“…associated nutrient retention (Glaser et al., 2002; Lehmann et al., 2003; Yamato et al., 2006; Hale et al., 2013), greater pH and base saturation (Glaser et al., 2002; Lehmann et al., 2003; Yamato et al., 2006; Major et al., 2010), increased available P (Chidumayo, 1994; Yamato et al., 2006),…”
BackgroundInfluentialLehmann, J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/447143a · Cited by 2,477
Jeffery, S., Verheijen, F. G. A., van der Velde, M., & Bastos, A. C. (2011) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015 · Cited by 2,422
A review of biochar and its use and function in soil
Sohi, S. P., Krull, E., Lopez-Capel, E., & Bol, R. (2010) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(10)05002-9 · Cited by 2,240
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2006, Guidelines for soil description.
- 2011, Sixth National Development Plan 2011–2015: Sustained Economic Growth and Poverty Peduction.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Agegnehu, G., Bass, A. M., Nelson, P. N., & Bird, M. I. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.054 · Cited by 909
Biomass for a sustainable bioeconomy: An overview of world biomass production and utilization
Antar, M., Lyu, D., Nazari, M., Shah, A., Zhou, X., & Smith, D. L. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110691 · Cited by 878
Does biochar improve soil water retention? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Razzaghi, F., Obour, P. B., & Arthur, E. (2020) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114055 · Cited by 669
O’Connor, D., Peng, T., Zhang, J., Tsang, D. C. W., Alessi, D. S., Shen, Z., Bolan, N. S., & Hou, D. (2017) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.132 · Cited by 619
Obia, A., Mulder, J., Martinsen, V., Cornelissen, G., & Børresen, T. (2016) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2015.08.002 · Cited by 488
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Martinsen, V., Mulder, J., Shitumbanuma, V., Sparrevik, M., Børresen, T., & Cornelissen, G.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
- University of Zambia (ZM)
- Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Martinsen, Vegard
- Venue
- Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-08-12
- Volume
- 177
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 681-695
- ISSN
- 1436-8730 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2624
- OpenAlex
- W2043860361
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 12.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Keywords
- biochar, corn cob, conservation agriculture, maize yield, peanut yield, soil nutrient availability, plant available water, cation exchange capacity, soil pH, aluminum availability, fertilizer dose, sandy soil, Zambia, soil organic carbon, crop rotation, residue retention, reduced tillage, soil physical properties, soil chemical properties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
