Interspecies scaling of biliary excreted drugs
Abstract
The objective of this study is to predict clearance of drugs in humans from animals which are excreted in the bile. Clearance (CL) of eight drugs known to be excreted in the bile were randomly selected from the literature. Scaling of CL was performed using at least three animal species. Using simple allometry, CL x mean life-span potential (MLP) or CL x brain weight, CLs of studied drugs were predicted in humans. The choice of one of the methods depended on the 'rule of exponents' as described by Mahmood and Balian. A 'correction factor' was calculated by adjusting bile flow rate based on the species body weight (bile flow = mL/day/kg body weight) or liver weight (bile flow = mL/day/kg liver weight). Using the 'rule of exponents' and combining it with the 'correction factor', the CLs of biliary excreted drugs were predicted in humans. Predicted CLs in humans from animals using simple allometry were several times higher for all eight drugs (% error [range] = 46-1703). Using the 'rule of exponents' and combining it with a 'correction factor' as described in this report provided a substantial improvement (% error [range] = 5-91) in the prediction of CL for biliary excreted drugs. The results of this study indicate that the CL of a biliary excreted drug may be overpredicted in humans and by applying the 'correction factor' employed here, the predictability of drug CL in humans from animal data may be significantly improved.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The predictability of human CL is significantly improved using the bile flow correction factor.
“The predictability of human CL is significantly improved using the bile flow correction factor [110].”
From Interpretation of Non-Clinical Data for Prediction of Human Pharmacokinetic Parameters: In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation and Allometric Scaling (2019) · cites this paper as [110]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Mahmood, I., & Sahajwalla, C.
- Affiliations
- United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mahmood, Iftekhar
- ORCID
- Mahmood, Iftekhar
- Venue
- Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1908-1914
- ISSN
- 0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971263174
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Keywords
- drug clearance, interspecies scaling, allometry, correction factors, brain weight
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Haplorhini, Bile, Body Weight, Dogs, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Organ Size, Predictive Value of Tests, Rabbits, Species Specificity, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review