Cited by 62Animal testing and alternativesPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Interspecies scaling of biliary excreted drugs

Mahmood, Iftekhar, Sahajwalla, Chandra·2002·Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Abstract

The objective of this study is to predict clearance of drugs in humans from animals which are excreted in the bile. Clearance (CL) of eight drugs known to be excreted in the bile were randomly selected from the literature. Scaling of CL was performed using at least three animal species. Using simple allometry, CL x mean life-span potential (MLP) or CL x brain weight, CLs of studied drugs were predicted in humans. The choice of one of the methods depended on the 'rule of exponents' as described by Mahmood and Balian. A 'correction factor' was calculated by adjusting bile flow rate based on the species body weight (bile flow = mL/day/kg body weight) or liver weight (bile flow = mL/day/kg liver weight). Using the 'rule of exponents' and combining it with the 'correction factor', the CLs of biliary excreted drugs were predicted in humans. Predicted CLs in humans from animals using simple allometry were several times higher for all eight drugs (% error [range] = 46-1703). Using the 'rule of exponents' and combining it with a 'correction factor' as described in this report provided a substantial improvement (% error [range] = 5-91) in the prediction of CL for biliary excreted drugs. The results of this study indicate that the CL of a biliary excreted drug may be overpredicted in humans and by applying the 'correction factor' employed here, the predictability of drug CL in humans from animal data may be significantly improved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jps.10174

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 62

Authors
Mahmood, I., & Sahajwalla, C.
Affiliations
United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Mahmood, Iftekhar
Venue
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-08
Volume
91
Issue
8
Pages
1908-1914
ISSN
0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971263174
Cited by
62
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
drug clearance, interspecies scaling, allometry, correction factors, brain weight
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Haplorhini, Bile, Body Weight, Dogs, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Organ Size, Predictive Value of Tests, Rabbits, Species Specificity, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review