PHRMA CPCDC initiative on predictive models of human pharmacokinetics, part 5: Prediction of plasma concentration–time profiles in human by using the physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic modeling approach
Abstract
The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for simulating human plasma concentration-time profiles for the unique drug dataset of blinded data that has been assembled as part of a Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America initiative. Combinations of absorption, distribution, and clearance models were tested with a PBPK approach that has been developed from published equations. An assessment of the quality of the model predictions was made on the basis of the shape of the plasma time courses and related parameters. Up to 69% of the simulations of plasma time courses made in human demonstrated a medium to high degree of accuracy for intravenous pharmacokinetics, whereas this number decreased to 23% after oral administration based on the selected criteria. The simulations resulted in a general underestimation of drug exposure (Cmax and AUC0- t ). The explanations for this underestimation are diverse. Therefore, in general it may be due to underprediction of absorption parameters and/or overprediction of distribution or oral first-pass. The implications of compound properties are demonstrated. The PBPK approach based on in vitro-input data was as accurate as the approach based on in vivo data. Overall, the scientific benefit of this modeling study was to obtain more extensive characterization of predictions of human PK from PBPK methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PBPK performance for human predictions was evaluated by PhRMA and they did not find a high degree of accuracy, especially for oral administration.
“Physiologically based pharmacokinetic performance for human predictions was evaluated by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America [90] and they did not find a high degree of accuracy, especially for oral administration.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 174
- Authors
- Poulin, P., Jones, R. D. O., Jones, H. M., Gibson, C. R., Rowland, M., Chien, J. Y., Ring, B. J., Adkison, K. K., Ku, M. S., He, H., Vuppugalla, R., Marathe, P., Fischer, V., Dutta, S., Sinha, V. K., Björnsson, T., Lavé, T., & Yates, J. W. T.
- Affiliations
- AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Pfizer (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
- Abbott (United States) (US)
- Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Poulin, Patrick
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4127-4157
- ISSN
- 0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050819978
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 20.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, oral absorption, first-pass metabolism, oral and intravenous administration
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Animals, Computer Simulation, Cooperative Behavior, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Models, Biological, Pharmacokinetics, Species Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Access to Information, Interdisciplinary Communication, Drug Discovery, Administration, Intravenous, Databases, Pharmaceutical, Gastrointestinal Absorption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review