Cited by 27Analytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsEstrogen and related hormone effectsBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods

Development, Application and Comparison of an Enzyme Immunoassay and a High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method for the Determination of the Aromatase Inhibitor CGS 20 267 in Biological Fluids

Pfister, C.U., Duval, M., Godbillon, J., Gosset, G., Gygax, D., Marfil, F., Sioufi, A., Winkler, B.·1994·Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Abstract

CGS 20,267 is a new potent and selective, nonsteroidal, oral aromatase inhibitor. For its determination in human plasma and urine, an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and an HPLC method were developed. The EIA showed good precision and accuracy (intra- and interassay variation between 3.0 and 17.7%, recoveries between 81 and 106%) and a quantitation limit of 0.7 nmol/L. A strong cross reactivity of the antibodies with the hydroxy metabolite of CGS 20,267 (CGP 44,645) was observed. The HPLC method showed a quantitation limit in plasma of 28 and 34 nmol/L for CGS 20,267 and CGP 44,645, respectively. For urine, concentrations down to 180 nmol/L (CGS 20,267) and 210 nmol/L (CGP 44,645) could be measured. A cross check between EIA and HPLC on plasma samples from healthy male volunteers or breast cancer patients treated orally with CGS 20,267 revealed an excellent correlation (slope = 0.934, intercept = 26, r = 0.991). However, the EIA measurements of urine samples yielded 3-25 times higher concentrations than those obtained by HPLC. Further, HPLC analysis revealed the presence of CGS 20,267 and cross-reacting metabolites in urine but not in plasma. Therefore, the EIA can only be used for the determination of CGS 20,267 in plasma samples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jps.2600830415

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfister, C. U., Duval, M., Godbillon, J., Gosset, G., Gygax, D., Marfil, F., Sioufi, A., & Winkler, B.
Venue
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-04
Volume
83
Issue
4
Pages
520-524
ISSN
0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035747744
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Keywords
letrozole, aromatase inhibitors, enzyme immunoassay, HPLC, plasma drug quantification, urine drug quantification, hydroxy metabolites, antibody cross-reactivity
MeSH terms
Letrozole, Animals, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Antibody Specificity, Breast Neoplasms, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Female, Guinea Pigs, Humans, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Male, Nitriles, Triazoles, Aromatase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review