The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biogenic amines: formation, action and toxicity – a review
Abstract
Biogenic amines (BA) are organic compounds commonly found in food, plants and animals, as well as microorganisms that are attributed with the production of BAs. They are formed as an effect of a chemical process: the decarboxylation of amino acids. Factors determining the formation of BAs include the availability of free amino acids and the presence of microorganisms that show activity with respect to carrying out the decarboxylation process. On the one hand, BAs are compounds that are crucial for maintaining cell viability, as well as the proper course of the organism's metabolic processes, such as protein synthesis, hormone synthesis and DNA replication. On the other hand, despite their positive effects on the functioning of the organism, an excessive content of BAs proves to be toxic (diarrhea, food poisoning, vomiting, sweating or tachycardia). Moreover, they can accelerate carcinogenesis. Amines are a natural component of plant and animal raw materials. As a result of the proven negative effects of amines on living organisms, the reduction of these compounds should be the subject of scientific research. The present review aims to synthesize and summarize the information currently available on BAs, as well as discuss the interpretation of the results. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(BIOHAZ), E. P. O. B. H. (2011) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2393 · Cited by 995
Cited by
Considerations for determining safety of probiotics: A USP perspective
Roe, A. L., Boyte, M.-E., Elkins, C. A., Goldman, V. S., Heimbach, J., Madden, E., Oketch-Rabah, H., Sanders, M. E., Sirois, J., & Smith, A. (2022) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105266 · Cited by 136
da Silva, T. F., Glória, R. D. A., Americo, M. F., Freitas, A. D. S., de Jesus, L. C. L., Barroso, F. A. L., Laguna, J. G., Coelho-Rocha, N. D., Tavares, L. M., le Loir, Y., et al. (2024) · Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins · doi:10.1007/s12602-024-10247-x · Cited by 117
Banana Peels: A Genuine Waste or a Wonderful Opportunity?
Yasin, M., Gangan, S., & Panchal, S. K. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15063195 · Cited by 43
Leonard, W., Zhang, P., Ying, D., Nie, S., Tindal, E., & Fang, Z. (2022) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132499 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Wójcik, W., Łukasiewicz, M., & Puppel, K.
- Venue
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-12-12
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2634-2640
- ISSN
- 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0010
- OpenAlex
- W3095577717
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.