Cited by 168Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsAgricultural Science and Fertilization

Unused fertiliser nitrogen in arable soils - its contribution to nitrate leaching

Macdonald, Andrew J, Powlson, David S, Poulton, Paul R, Jenkinson, David S·1989·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

Nitrate present in arable soils in autumn is at risk to leaching during the following winter. To see whether unused nitrogen fertiliser was a major source of this nitrate, 15 N‐labelled fertiliser was applied to 11 winter wheat crops at rates of between 47 and 234 kg N ha−1 in spring. The experiments were on three contrasting soil types in south‐east England. On average, 17′% of the N from spring‐applied labelled fertiliser remained in the 0–23 cm soil layer at harvest (range, 7–36%) but only a small proportion was in inorganic forms (ammonium + nitrate). This was never more than 5 kg N ha−1 and averaged only 1·3% of the fertiliser N applied (range, 0·4–3·6 %). Between 79 and 98% of the inorganic N in soils at harvest was unlabelled, being derived from the mineralisation of organic N rather than from unused fertiliser. The amount of unlabelled N was much greater where wheat was grown after ploughing up grass or grass/clover leys than where it was grown in all‐arable rotations. When wheat was grown without N fertiliser, soil inorganic N content at harvest was no lower than in plots given fertiliser at rates up to 234 kg N ha−1. This work indicates that, for soil growing winter wheat, almost all of the nitrate at risk to leaching over the winter period comes from mineralisation of organic N, not from unused fertiliser applied in spring. Consequently, even a drastic reduction in N fertiliser use would have little effect on nitrate leaching.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.2740460404

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 168

Authors
Macdonald, A. J., Powlson, D. S., Poulton, P. R., & Jenkinson, D. S.
Affiliations
Rothamsted Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Powlson, David S
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-01
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
407-419
ISSN
  • 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0010
OpenAlex
W1995140608
Cited by
168
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
nitrate leaching, winter wheat, soil mineral nitrogen, arable rotation, nitrogen fertilizer reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review