Cited by 252Food and Agricultural SciencesPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Nutritional comparison of fresh, frozen, and canned fruits and vegetables II. Vitamin A and carotenoids, vitamin E, minerals and fiber

Rickman, Joy C, Bruhn, Christine M, Barrett, Diane M·2007·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

In this second part of our review, we examine the literature for changes in carotenoids, vitamin E, minerals, and fiber due to processing, storage, and cooking of fresh, frozen, and canned fruits and vegetables. While inconsistencies in methodology and reporting methods complicate interpretation of the data, the results show that these nutrients are generally similar in comparable fresh and processed products. The higher levels of carotenoids typically found in canned as compared to fresh products may be attributed to either reporting results on a wet rather than dry weight basis, greater extractability, or differences in cultivars. There are relatively few studies on processing, storage, and cooking effects on vitamin E in fruits and vegetables. Further research is needed to understand nutritional changes in those few fruits and vegetables rich in vitamin E, such as tomatoes. Minerals and fiber are generally stable to processing, storage, and cooking, but may be lost in peeling and other removal steps during processing. Mineral uptake (e.g., calcium) or addition (e.g., sodium) during processing can change the natural mineral composition of a product. Sodium concerns in canned food can be addressed by choosing products with no salt added. Since nutrient content varies considerably by commodity, cultivar, and postharvest treatments, inclusion of a wide variety of fruits and vegetables in the diet is encouraged. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.2824

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rickman, J. C., Bruhn, C. M., & Barrett, D. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Bruhn, Christine M
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-14
Volume
87
Issue
7
Pages
1185-1196
ISSN
  • 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0010
OpenAlex
W2123326363
Cited by
252
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
fruit and vegetable processing, frozen produce, vitamin A, carotenoids, vitamin E, minerals, dietary fiber, cooking effects, storage effects, nutrient retention, sodium content, calcium fortification, cultivar differences, postharvest treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review