Cited by 107Coffee research and impactsFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFood Chemistry and Fat Analysis

Characterization and comparison of cold brew and cold drip coffee extraction methods

Angeloni, Giulia, Guerrini, Lorenzo, Masella, Piernicola, Innocenti, Marzia, Bellumori, Maria, Parenti, Alessandro·2019·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Each region of the world has its own methods, protocols, instruments and procedures regarding how to brew coffee. The final result in the cup is strongly affected by the extraction method, and many studies have focused on this subject. However, few studies have investigated slow, cold extraction methods, despite their popularity among baristas. Therefore, the present study aimed to characterize and compare two cold extraction methods: cold brew and cold drip. RESULTS: Physical and chemical analyses were used to describe coffee beverages in terms of pH, total solids, refractive index, density and viscosity. Caffeine and cinnamic acids were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/diode array detector and HPLC/mass spectrometry. A sensory evaluation included aroma, flavor and textural attributes. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were found in the chemical and physical parameters, both between and within the two methods, as a function of the extraction temperature and contact time. Similarly, the sensory evaluation found differences in flavor profiles, as measured in terms of bitterness, sweetness, sourness and global intensity. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.9200

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 107

Authors
Angeloni, G., Guerrini, L., Masella, P., Innocenti, M., Bellumori, M., & Parenti, A.
Affiliations
University of Florence (IT)
Corresponding author
Angeloni, Giulia
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-06
Volume
99
Issue
1
Pages
391-399
ISSN
  • 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0010
OpenAlex
W2808646378
Cited by
107
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
Keywords
cold brew coffee, caffeine content, cinnamic acid, sensory evaluation, bitterness, extraction temperature, contact time, coffee flavor
MeSH terms
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Coffee, Cooking, Flavoring Agents, Humans, Seeds, Mass Spectrometry, Taste, Coffea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review