Probiotic microorganisms detoxify ochratoxin A in both a chicken liver cell line and chickens
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The administration of probiotics and prebiotics (synbiotics) is a promising method for detoxification of ochratoxin A (OTA) in animals. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of five probiotic strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and one Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strain, from three different synbiotics for poultry, to detoxify OTA. In addition, we also investigated the genotoxicity of faecal water (FW) of chickens after administering OTA and/or synbiotics for 42 days. RESULTS: All tested LAB and yeast strains had the ability to detoxify OTA by significant (P < 0.05) reducing its concentration (by 31.3-47.7% and 31.9%, respectively, after 24 h incubation) and genotoxicity (by 22.6-51.8% and 52.7%, respectively). Synbiotics composed of four and five probiotic strains significantly (P < 0.05) decreased FW genotoxicity of chicks, after exposure to OTA, to the level seen in the control group (21.8% ± 1.7%) and were more effective than synbiotics composed of three probiotic strains (31.5%). CONCLUSION: These results showed that there was a beneficial effect of the synbiotics on the gastrointestinal tract of animals. Furthermore, synbiotic preparations containing four or five of tested strains can be considered as preventive agents in the contamination of poultry with OTA. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ability of lactic acid bacteria to remove mycotoxins has been studied by other authors, including the mycotoxins analyzed in this work, Aflatoxin B1 and Ochratoxin.
“In addition, the ability of lactic acid bacteria to remove mycotoxins has been studied by other authors [58,59], including the mycotoxins analyzed in our work Aflatoxin B1 [60] and Ochratoxin [61].”
From Probiotic and Antifungal Attributes of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolates from Naturally Fermented Brazilian Table Olives (2022) · cites this paper as [61]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Markowiak, P., Śliżewska, K., Nowak, A., Chlebicz, A., Żbikowski, A., Pawłowski, K., & Szeleszczuk, P.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences Lodz University of Technology Lodz Poland
- Lodz University of Technology (PL)
- Warsaw University of Life Sciences (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Śliżewska, Katarzyna
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4309-4318
- ISSN
- 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0010
- OpenAlex
- W2919686358
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju (PBS3/A8/32/2015)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- ochratoxin A, probiotics, synbiotics, lactic acid bacteria, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mycotoxin detoxification, genotoxicity, fecal water, poultry
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Feed, Cell Line, Chickens, Liver, Ochratoxins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Probiotics, Gastrointestinal Tract, Lactobacillales, Prebiotics, Synbiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review