The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The role of core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of suspected soft tissue tumours
Abstract
Background: Controversy surrounds the biopsy method of choice for the histological diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsy (CNB) in patients referred with the suspicion of a soft tissue sarcoma. Methodology: Previously undiagnosed patients (n = 530) with a suspected soft tissue tumour (STT) who underwent CNB at initial presentation were identified. Specific end‐points were the ability to differentiate benign from malignant tumours, soft tissue from non‐STT, and for sarcomas to define subtype and grade. Results: Of the 530 patients, 426 patients (80.4%) with soft tissue tumours were identified, of which 225 (52.8%) were malignant and 201 (47.2%) benign. In the remaining 104 patients, tumours masquerading as STT were diagnosed. CNB could differentiate soft tissue sarcomas from benign soft tissue tumours with an accuracy of 97.6%. High grade were differentiated from low grade sarcomas with an accuracy of 86.3%. Tumour subtype was accurately assigned in 89.5% of benign tumours and 88.0% of sarcomas. Conclusion: CNB is simple, safe and can accurately diagnose benign and malignant soft tissue tumours. It can reliably identify other tumours masquerading as sarcoma. CNB should be the method of choice to obtain a histological diagnosis in suspected STT. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010;102:523–529. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Risk assessment in solitary fibrous tumors: validation and refinement of a risk stratification model
Demicco, E. G., Wagner, M. J., Maki, R. G., Gupta, V., Iofin, I., Lazar, A. J., & Wang, W.-L. (2017) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/modpathol.2017.54 · Cited by 466
Management of sarcoma in the Asia-Pacific region: resource-stratified guidelines.
Lewin, J., Puri, A., Quek, R., Ngan, R., Alcasabas, A. P., Wood, D., & Thomas, D. (2013) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70475-3 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Strauss, D. C., Qureshi, Y. A., Hayes, A. J., Thway, K., Fisher, C., & Thomas, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 523-529
- ISSN
- 0022-4790 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9098
- OpenAlex
- W2094137522
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of suspected soft tissue tumours. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jso.21600
- The paper
- Strauss, D. C., Qureshi, Y. A., Hayes, A. J., Thway, K., Fisher, C., & Thomas, J. M. (2010). The role of core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of suspected soft tissue tumours. Journal of Surgical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21600
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.