The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recent developments in the field of monolithic stationary phases for capillary electrochromatography
Abstract
This review summarizes the contributions to the rapidly growing area of monolithic columns based on both silica and synthetic polymers for capillary electrochromatography and chip electrochromatography, with a focus on those published during the year 2004. A wide variety of both modified approaches to the “old” monoliths and new monoliths have been reported despite the very short period of time covered. This demonstrates that monolithic stationary phases have become a well‐established format in the field of electrochromatography. The simplicity of their preparation as well as the good control over their porous properties and surface chemistries make the monolithic separation media an attractive alternative to capillary columns packed with particulate materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ali, F., & Cheong, W. J. (2015) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.201500765 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Svec, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Separation Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 729-745
- ISSN
- 1615-9306 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9314
- OpenAlex
- W2153478217
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent developments in the field of monolithic stationary phases for capillary electrochromatography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jssc.200400086
- The paper
- Svec, F. (2005). Recent developments in the field of monolithic stationary phases for capillary electrochromatography. Journal of Separation Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200400086
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
