Cited by 4Hormonal and reproductive studiesAnalytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsAnalytical chemistry methods development

A robust LC–MS/MS assay with online cleanup for measurement of serum testosterone

Zhou, Yu, Wang, Sihe·2019·Journal of Separation Science

Abstract

Accurate measurement of low levels of testosterone is critical for diagnosis and treatment of androgen disorders. The very low concentrations of testosterone in children, females, and males with androgen suppression therapies necessitate the use of mass spectrometry‐based methods. We aimed to develop a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method with simplified sample preparation and online solid‐phase extraction cleanup to achieve enhanced precision, accuracy, robustness, and cost‐effectiveness. The assay was linear from 10 to 20 000 pg/mL with an analytical recovery of 93–104%. The total coefficient of variation was 2.5, 1.9, and 1.7% at concentration levels of 348, 5432, and 10 848 pg/mL, respectively. No significant carryover was observed from samples with concentrations up to 20 000 pg/mL. No significant interference was observed from androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone, epi‐testosterone, and estriol. Comparison with CDC Hormone Standardization program (HoSt) reference samples with defined values (n = 40) showed a Deming regression slope of 0.963, intercept of 28.06 pg/mL, standard error of estimate was 66.9, a correlation coefficient of 0.9996, and a mean bias of −0.6%. The method met the accuracy criteria by the CDC HoSt program. In addition, we achieved >12 000 injections on a single analytical column without significant performance deterioration due to the specific online solid‐phase extraction settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jssc.201801189

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, Y., & Wang, S.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Sihe
Venue
Journal of Separation Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-05
Volume
42
Issue
15
Pages
2561-2568
ISSN
  • 1615-9306 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9314
OpenAlex
W2945127529
Cited by
4
References
4
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Separation Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
Keywords
serum testosterone, LC-MS/MS assay, on-line solid-phase extraction, sample cleanup, androgen deprivation therapy, assay robustness, carryover, method validation
MeSH terms
Chromatography, Liquid, Humans, Testosterone, Solid Phase Extraction, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review