The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Towards a classification of cultural tourists
Abstract
This paper proposes a model to segment the cultural tourism market according to two dimensions: (i) the importance of cultural motives in the decision to visit a destination and (ii) depth of experience. The model is tested empirically using Hong Kong as a case study. The test identified five discrete cultural tourism market segments that exhibited substantially different behaviour. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Li, X.-Z., Chen, C.-C., Kang, X., & Kang, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943277 · Cited by 50
A visitor flow management process for touristified archaeological sites
Enseñat-Soberanis, F., Frausto-Martínez, O., & Gándara-Vázquez, M. (2019) · Journal of Heritage Tourism · doi:10.1080/1743873x.2018.1529179 · Cited by 45
Social inclusion and audience development at the Royal Opera House: a tourist perspective
Guachalla, A. (2017) · International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research · doi:10.1108/ijcthr-07-2016-0071 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- McKercher, B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Tourism Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-38
- ISSN
- 1099-2340 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1970
- OpenAlex
- W2165228852
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
