Cited by 153Intimate Partner and Family ViolencePosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and Trauma

Role of distinct PTSD symptoms in intimate partner reabuse: A prospective study

Krause, Elizabeth D., Kaltman, Stacey, Goodman, Lisa, Dutton, Mary Ann·2006·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

This prospective study examines the impact of four posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom clusters (hyperarousal, reexperiencing, numbing, and avoidance) on reabuse over 1 year among women exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV). The covariates include severity of IPV, a history of childhood violence, and characteristics of the abusive relationship. Although both hyperarousal and numbing symptoms were higher at baseline among women subsequently reabused, only numbing symptoms increased the odds of reabuse after controlling for the covariates. Greater IPV severity and shorter relationship duration also increased the risk of reabuse. Results indicate that specific symptoms of PTSD, especially numbing, need to be addressed to increase the safety of women seeking services for IPV.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.20136

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within predominantly African American female samples, emotional numbing increased risk for IPV victimization, whereas active avoidance protected against it.

    “Within predominantly African American female samples, researchers found that emotional numbing increased risk for IPV victimization, whereas active avoidance protected against it (Krause et al., 2006).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 153

Authors
Krause, E. D., Kaltman, S., Goodman, L., & Dutton, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
  • Boston College (US)
Corresponding author
Krause, Elizabeth D.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-08
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
507-516
ISSN
0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032113378
Cited by
153
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Justice (98-WT-VX-0023, 2001 WT-RX 0001)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1F32MH071011-1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, intimate partner violence, PTSD symptom clusters, numbing symptoms, hyperarousal, re-experiencing, avoidance, childhood violence, relationship duration, IPV severity
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Models, Psychological, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Spouse Abuse, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Cluster Analysis, Battered Women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review