Cited by 188Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effectiveness of virtual reality exposure therapy for active duty soldiers in a military mental health clinic

Reger, Greg M., Holloway, Kevin M., Candy, Colette, Rothbaum, Barbara O., Difede, JoAnn, Rizzo, Albert A., Gahm, Gregory A.·2011·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Exposure therapy is an evidence-based treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but research evaluating its effectiveness with active duty service members is limited. This report examines the effectiveness of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRE) for active duty soldiers (N = 24) seeking treatment following a deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan. Relative to their pretreatment self-reported symptoms on the PTSD Checklist, Military Version (M = 60.92; SD = 11.03), patients reported a significant reduction at posttreatment (M = 47.08; SD = 12.70; p < .001). Sixty-two percent of patients (n = 15) reported a reliable change of 11 points or more. This study supports the effectiveness of exposure therapy for active duty soldiers and extends previous research on VRE to this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.20574

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exposure therapy is an effective psychotherapeutic intervention for anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and acute or posttraumatic stress disorder.

    “Exposure therapy is an effective psychotherapeutic intervention for anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and acute or posttraumatic stress disorder.”

    From EFFECT OF TRAINING ON BELIEFS ABOUT EXPOSURE THERAPY IN EXPERIENCED THERAPISTS (2023) · cites this paper as Reger et al., 2011

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 188

Authors
Reger, G. M., Holloway, K. M., Candy, C., Rothbaum, B. O., Difede, J., Rizzo, A. A., & Gahm, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Madigan Army Medical Center (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Reger, Greg M.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
93-96
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W2135675289
Cited by
188
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 16
FWCI
23.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
virtual reality exposure therapy, post-traumatic stress disorder, active duty military personnel, military mental health, Iraq and Afghanistan deployment, treatment effectiveness, combat veterans
MeSH terms
Adult, Combat Disorders, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Military Personnel, Retrospective Studies, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, User-Computer Interface, Treatment Outcome, Iraq War, 2003-2011, Afghan Campaign 2001-

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review