Hotspots in Trauma Memories and Their Relationship to Successful Trauma‐Focused Psychotherapy: A Pilot Study
Abstract
Imaginal exposure is an essential element of trauma‐focused psychotherapies for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Exposure should in particular focus on the “hotspots,” the parts of trauma memories that cause high levels of emotional distress which are often reexperienced. Our aim was to investigate whether differences in the focus on hotspots differentiate between successful and unsuccessful trauma‐focused psychotherapies. As part of a randomized trial, 45 PTSD patients completed brief eclectic psychotherapy for PTSD. We retrospectively assessed audio recordings of therapy sessions of 20 patients. Frequency of hotspots and the associated emotions, cognitions, and characteristics were compared for the most successful (n = 10) versus the least successful (n = 10) treatments. The mean number of unique hotspots per patient was 3.20, and this number did not differ between successful and unsuccessful treatments. In successful treatments, however, hotspots were more frequently addressed (r = .48), and they were accompanied by more characteristics of hotspots (r = .39), such as an audible change in affect, indicating medium‐ to large‐sized effects. Repeatedly focusing on hotspots and looking for associated characteristics of hotspots may help clinicians to enhance the efficacy of imaginal exposure for patients who would otherwise show insufficient response to treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most recognized forms of psychological treatment for PTSD involve overcoming avoidance and bringing about a degree of exposure to the traumatic memory, with a focus on addressing the most intense or painful moments likely to be particularly helpful.
“Most recognized forms of psychological treatment for PTSD, such as trauma-focused cognitive-behavior therapy, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), and narrative exposure therapy, involve overcoming avoidance and bringing about a degree of exposure to the traumatic memory, with a focus on addressing the most intense or painful moments likely to be particularly helpful [42].”
From Memory and Forgetting (2018) · cites this paper as [42]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Nijdam, M. J., Baas, M. A. M., Olff, M., & Gersons, B. P. R.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Nijdam, Mirjam J.
- Venue
- Journal of Traumatic Stress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-44
- ISSN
- 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6598
- OpenAlex
- W1789587657
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Academic Medical Center at the University of Amsterdam
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, imaginal exposure, trauma-focused psychotherapy, treatment outcomes, treatment response
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Emotions, Female, Humans, Imagination, Implosive Therapy, Life Change Events, Male, Netherlands, Pilot Projects, Psychotherapy, Retrospective Studies, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Treatment Outcome, Memory, Episodic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review