Prevalence and Correlates of Posttrauma Distorted Beliefs: Evaluating DSM‐5 PTSD Expanded Cognitive Symptoms in a National Sample
Abstract
The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM‐5; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013) modified the diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), including expanding the scope of dysfunctional, posttrauma changes in belief (symptoms D2—persistent negative beliefs and expectations about oneself or the world, and D3—persistent distorted blame of self or others for the cause or consequences of the traumatic event). D2 and D3 were investigated using a national sample of U.S. adults (N = 2,498) recruited from an online panel. The prevalence of D2 and D3 was substantially higher among those with lifetime PTSD than among trauma‐exposed individuals without lifetime PTSD (D2: 74.6% vs 23.9%; D3: 80.6% vs 35.7%). In multivariate analyses, the strongest associates of D2 were interpersonal assault (OR = 2.39), witnessing interpersonal assault (OR = 1.63), gender (female, OR = 2.11), and number of reported traumatic events (OR = 1.88). The strongest correlates of D3 were interpersonal assault (OR = 3.08), witnessing interpersonal assault (OR = 1.57), gender (female, OR = 2.30), and number of reported traumatic events (OR = 1.91). The findings suggested the expanded cognitive symptoms in the DSM‐5 diagnostic criteria better capture the cognitive complexity of PTSD than those of the DSM‐IV.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One of the hallmark symptoms of PTSD involves alterations in cognition and mood, where individuals with PTSD frequently experience persistent negative trauma-related emotions and associated changes in perception of the self and the world.
“As described above, one of the hallmark symptoms of PTSD involves alterations in cognition and mood, where individuals with PTSD frequently experience persistent negative trauma-related emotions and associated changes in perception of the self and the world (Foa et al., 1999; Cox et al., 2014; Frewen et al., 2017).”
From How Processing of Sensory Information From the Internal and External Worlds Shape the Perception and Engagement With the World in the Aftermath of Trauma: Implications for PTSD (2021) · cites this paper as Cox et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 76
- Authors
- Cox, K. S., Resnick, H. S., & Kilpatrick, D. G.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cox, Keith S.
- Venue
- Journal of Traumatic Stress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-05-27
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 299-306
- ISSN
- 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6598
- OpenAlex
- W1591374762
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Psychiatric Association (APA) DSM Research Program
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, cognitive symptoms, gender differences, trauma exposure, prevalence
- MeSH terms
- Accidents, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Scapegoating, Self Concept, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Violence, Prevalence, Trust, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review