Cited by 76Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Prevalence and Correlates of Posttrauma Distorted Beliefs: Evaluating DSM‐5 PTSD Expanded Cognitive Symptoms in a National Sample

Cox, Keith S., Resnick, Heidi S., Kilpatrick, Dean G.·2014·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM‐5; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013) modified the diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), including expanding the scope of dysfunctional, posttrauma changes in belief (symptoms D2—persistent negative beliefs and expectations about oneself or the world, and D3—persistent distorted blame of self or others for the cause or consequences of the traumatic event). D2 and D3 were investigated using a national sample of U.S. adults (N = 2,498) recruited from an online panel. The prevalence of D2 and D3 was substantially higher among those with lifetime PTSD than among trauma‐exposed individuals without lifetime PTSD (D2: 74.6% vs 23.9%; D3: 80.6% vs 35.7%). In multivariate analyses, the strongest associates of D2 were interpersonal assault (OR = 2.39), witnessing interpersonal assault (OR = 1.63), gender (female, OR = 2.11), and number of reported traumatic events (OR = 1.88). The strongest correlates of D3 were interpersonal assault (OR = 3.08), witnessing interpersonal assault (OR = 1.57), gender (female, OR = 2.30), and number of reported traumatic events (OR = 1.91). The findings suggested the expanded cognitive symptoms in the DSM‐5 diagnostic criteria better capture the cognitive complexity of PTSD than those of the DSM‐IV.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.21925

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 76

Authors
Cox, K. S., Resnick, H. S., & Kilpatrick, D. G.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Cox, Keith S.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-27
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
299-306
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W1591374762
Cited by
76
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Psychiatric Association (APA) DSM Research Program
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, cognitive symptoms, gender differences, trauma exposure, prevalence
MeSH terms
Accidents, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Scapegoating, Self Concept, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Violence, Prevalence, Trust, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review