Cited by 26Ethics in Clinical ResearchPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and Trauma

Minority participation in randomized controlled trials for prolonged exposure therapy: A systematic review of the literature

Benuto, Lorraine T., Bennett, Natalie M., Casas, Jena B.·2020·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Per the most recent census, non-Latinx White individuals comprise the majority of the U.S. population (76.6%); Latinx individuals make up 18.3% of the total U.S. population, followed by African Americans (13.4%) and Asians (5.9%). Given the high prevalence rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) observed across many ethnoracial minority groups in the United States, the fact that PTSD presentation may vary across culture, and the National Institute of Health's mandates for the inclusion of women and minorities in clinical outcome research, the aim of the present systematic review was to examine minority inclusion in clinical outcome research for PTSD. Our review focused exclusively on one empirically supported treatment: prolonged exposure therapy (PE); we identified 38 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Apart from African Americans, who were overrepresented in 21 studies (inclusion rate range: 13.5%-73.9%), ethnoracial minority inclusion in RCTs examining PE was low. More specifically, across included studies that reported ethnoracial minority data, 58.9% of participants were White, 31.1% were African American, 4.9% were Latinx, 0.6% were Asian American or Pacific Islander, and 4.7% reported race as "other." Inclusion rates for ethnoracial minorities appeared to increase across time, and recruitment strategies did not appear to be associated with increased ethnoracial minority participation in RCTs for PE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.22539

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 26

Authors
Benuto, L. T., Bennett, N. M., & Casas, J. B.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Corresponding author
Benuto, Lorraine T.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06-10
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
420-431
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W3033370644
Cited by
26
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
prolonged exposure therapy, post-traumatic stress disorder, racial and ethnic diversity in clinical trials, African American participants
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, Research Design, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review