Cited by 50LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyChild Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

The Effects of Polyvictimization on Mental and Physical Health Outcomes in an LGBTQ Sample

Kassing, Francesca, Casanova, Tracy, Griffin, James A., Wood, Elizabeth, Stepleman, Lara M.·2021·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) individuals are at elevated risk for violent victimization and often experience increased health disparities compared to their non-LGBTQ counterparts. The present study examined associations between polyvictimization and mental and physical health in an LGBTQ sample. Participants included 385 LGBTQ individuals involved in a larger health-needs assessment of LGBTQ individuals living in the southeastern United States. The sample primarily identified as gay/lesbian (63.4%), cisgender (78.7%), and White (66.5%), and the mean participant age was 34.82 years (SD = 13.45). A latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted on seven items assessing different types of violence exposure. The LCA identified a three-class model, with classes characterized by low trauma exposure (71.4%), nondiscriminatory violence (15.1%), and high trauma exposure (13.5%). Differences in demographic characteristics, perceptions of mental and physical health, and diagnoses of specific health conditions were assessed across classes. The high-trauma class reported poorer perceived physical and mental health compared to the other two classes, with mean differences in past-month poor health days ranging from 11.38 to 17.37. There were no differences between the classes regarding specific physical health conditions; however, the high-trauma and nondiscriminatory violence classes had significantly higher rates of anxiety, depression, drug abuse, and suicidality than the low-trauma class, ORs = 2.39-23.83. The present findings suggest that polyvictimization is an important risk factor for poor health among LGBTQ individuals. These results have implications for addressing health disparities among the broader LGBTQ community.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.22579

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 50

Authors
Kassing, F., Casanova, T., Griffin, J. A., Wood, E., & Stepleman, L. M.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Augusta University (US)
  • Chase Brexton Health Care (US)
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-17
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
161-171
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W3061683868
Cited by
50
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Arnold P. Gold Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
polyvictimization, LGBTQ+ people, violence exposure, mental health, physical health, health disparities, anxiety, depression, drug abuse, suicidality, trauma exposure, latent class analysis
MeSH terms
Psychological Trauma, Sexual and Gender Minorities, Gender-Based Violence, Latent Class Analysis, Adult, Female, Georgia, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, South Carolina, Spouse Abuse, Crime Victims, Stalking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review