Depression and Anxiety During the COVID‐19 Pandemic in an Urban, Low‐Income Public University Sample
Open accessAbstract
Mental health disparities in the aftermath of national disasters and the protective role of socioeconomic status are both well documented. We assessed the prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms among underresourced public university students during the COVID‐19 pandemic in New York City. Between April 8, 2020, and May 2, 2020, adult students (N = 1,821) across the CUNY system completed an online survey examining COVID‐19–related stressors and mental health and sociodemographic factors. Using multivariable logistical regression to assess the association between COVID‐19–related stressors and depression and anxiety symptoms, we found a high prevalence and severity of depression and anxiety symptoms. We also observed that more exposure to COVID‐19–related stressors was associated with increased depressive (27.0%, 41.4%, and 63.1% for low‐, medium‐, and high‐level stressors, respectively) and anxiety symptoms (19.3%, 34.6%, 52.2%). In addition, the degree of exposure to COVID‐19–related stressors served as an important predictor of depression and anxiety symptoms. Compared to high levels of stressors, the odds of depression were 0.2, 95% CI [0.2, 0.3] for low‐ and 0.4, 95% CI [0.3, 0.5] for medium‐level stressors; for anxiety, the odds were 0.2, 95% CI [0.2, 0.3] for low and 0.05, 95% CI [0.4, 0.6] for medium stressors. Finally, household savings of less than $5,000 increased the risk of anxiety but not depression symptoms, OR = 1.3, 95% CI [1.0,1.6]. Together, these findings tell a devastating story of psychological distress among students from lower socioeconomic groups living in the COVID‐19 epicenter of the U.S. pandemic.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compared to non-Hispanic students, Hispanic young adults reported elevated levels of anxiety and depression while multiracial/multiethnic students and those from smaller ethnic groups showed the highest levels of distress symptoms during the first wave of COVID-19 in New York.
“Rudenstine et al., 2020 found that compared to non-Hispanic students, Hispanic young adults reported elevated levels of anxiety and depression while multiracial/multiethnic students and those from smaller ethnic groups showed the highest levels of distress symptoms during the first wave of COVID-19 in New York.”
From Young Adult Adaptability to the Social Challenges of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Protective Role of Friendships (2022) · cites this paper as Rudenstine et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 251
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Adeola, F. (2009). Mental health and psychosocial distress sequelae of Katrina: An empirical study of survivors. Research in Human Ecology , 16 (2), 195-210.
- Ettman C. K., Abdalla S. H. M., Cohen G. H., Sampson L., Vivier P. M., & Galea S. (in press). Depression in U.S. adults before and during COVID-19. Journal of the American Medical Association Network Open . In press.
- Maguen, S., Neria, Y., Conoscenti, L. M., & Litz, B. T. (2012). Depression and prolonged grief in the wake of disasters. In Y . Neria, S. Galea, & F. H. Norris (Eds.), Mental health and d Disasters (pp. 116-130). Cambridge University Press.
- Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Lowe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder. Archives of Internal Medicine , 166 (10), 1092-1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10. 1092 · DOI
- Authors
- Rudenstine, S., McNeal, K., Schulder, T., Ettman, C. K., Hernandez, M., Gvozdieva, K., & Galea, S.
- Affiliations
- City College of New York (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Department of Psychology City College of New York New York New York USA
- Corresponding author
- Rudenstine, Sasha
- Venue
- Journal of Traumatic Stress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-10-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12-22
- ISSN
- 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6598
- PMC
- PMC7675401
- OpenAlex
- W3092306296
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 19.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- depression, anxiety, COVID-19 pandemic, mental health disparities, socioeconomic status, university students, low-income students, household savings, psychological distress, New York City
- MeSH terms
- Economic Status, Psychological Distress, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New York City, Poverty, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Students, Prevalence, Young Adult, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review