The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Post‐fledging survival in passerine birds and the value of post‐fledging studies to conservation
Abstract
Conservation efforts are most effective when we have complete demographic information for a species of concern. Nevertheless, fundamental gaps in our knowledge of demography still exist for many taxa. For passerine birds, the period of time directly after young birds leave the nest and before they disperse and/or migrate (i.e., the post‐fledging period) remains an understudied life stage. We reviewed the literature on survival of passerine birds during the post‐fledging period to synthesize current knowledge on survival rates and the factors affecting these rates, and conducted a sensitivity analysis to explore the relationship between population growth and post‐fledging survival across the range of rates reported in the literature. Fledgling age was a strong predictor of survival, with the highest mortality occurring during the first 3 weeks after birds fledged. Among species, survival ranged from 0.23 to 0.87 during the first 3 weeks post‐fledging and increased with adult body mass and nestling period duration. The relatively high proportion (12 of 19; 63%) of studies that detected at least 1 habitat effect on survival indicates that management focused on post‐fledging habitat can improve survival. Sensitivity analyses indicated that post‐fledging survival rates less than approximately 0.4 require unrealistic overwinter survival rates of juveniles to prevent population decline, unless adult survival rates and seasonal fecundity are high. Post‐fledging survival is a useful metric for monitoring passerine populations because it sets the ceiling on first‐year survival, responds to habitat management, and leads to more comprehensive demographic models for songbirds. © 2014 The Wildlife Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
The Evolution of Life-histories
Benton, T. G., & Stearne, S. C. (1993) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5403 · Cited by 12,228
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation
Pulliam, H. R. (1988) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284880 · Cited by 5,367
Logistic Regression Using SAS: Theory and Application
Allison, P. D. (1999) · Cited by 2,859
The Migration Ecology of Birds
(2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-517367-4.x5000-1 · Cited by 1,844
CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses
Dunning Jr., J. B. (2007) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420064452 · Cited by 1,787
Regional Forest Fragmentation and the Nesting Success of Migratory Birds
Robinson, S. K., Thompson, F. R., Donovan, T. M., Whitehead, D. R., & Faaborg, J. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.267.5206.1987 · Cited by 1,442
Self-citationPopulation Fluctuations and Clutch-Size in the Great Tit, Parus major L.
Perrins, C. M. (1965) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/2453 · Cited by 1,241
A Stage‐Based Population Model for Loggerhead Sea Turtles and Implications for Conservation
Crouse, D. T., Crowder, L. B., & Caswell, H. (1987) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939225 · Cited by 1,191
Metadata
- Authors
- Cox, W. A., Thompson, F. R., Cox, A. S., & Faaborg, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-193
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- 1937-2817
- OpenAlex
- W1491076343
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 20.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post‐fledging survival in passerine birds and the value of post‐fledging studies to conservation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jwmg.670
- The paper
- Cox, W. A., Thompson, F. R., Cox, A. S., & Faaborg, J. (2014). Post‐fledging survival in passerine birds and the value of post‐fledging studies to conservation. The Journal of Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.670
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.