The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quasi‐steady‐state approximations in air pollution modeling: Comparison of two numerical schemes for oxidant prediction
Abstract
A numerical method to solve the set of differential equations which describes the chemical development in polluted air is presented. The photochemical lifetimes, continuously monitored for all compounds, determine how the integrations are performed at all times. Components with lifetimes less than 10% of the time step, which is taken as 30 sec, are assumed to be in photochemical equilibrium, while compounds with photochemical lifetimes greater than 100 times the time step are computed according to Euler's method. All other components are calculated from the exponential solution of the continuity equation. The computational accuracy may be improved by iteration on components assumed to be determined by the instant values of other components. The convergence of the iteration is speeded up by ordering the short‐lived compounds in a hierarchical sequence. Since computational errors connected with QSSA methods are difficult to assess, comparison with an automatic scheme is necessary. Our method has been compared with Gear's method for a range of model mixtures of hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, and air, thought to cover most conceivable situations of atmospheric pollution. The agreement with Gear's method is within a few percent for all components all the time, in most cases even within 1%. No accumulation of deviations occur during long‐term integrations (e.g., 48 hr with day and night shiftings), and differences which appear during periods with strong concentration gradients (e.g., after sunrise) vanish when the activity has culminated. The method presented here is considerably more efficient than Gear's method, with respect to both computer time and storage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dalsøren, S. B., Endresen, Ø., Isaksen, I. S. A., Gravir, G., & Sørgård, E. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd006927 · Cited by 110
Self-citationFuglestvedt, J. S., Jonson, J. E., & Isaksen, I. S. A. (1994) · Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology · doi:10.3402/tellusb.v46i3.15790 · Cited by 78
Self-citationImpact of H2O emissions from cryoplanes and kerosene aircraft on the atmosphere
Gauss, M., Isaksen, I. S. A., Wong, S., & Wang, W. ‐. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2002jd002623 · Cited by 60
Self-citationHodnebrog, Ø., Berntsen, T. K., Dessens, O., Gauss, M., Grewe, V., Isaksen, I. S. A., Koffi, B., Myhre, G., Olivié, D., Prather, M. J., et al. (2011) · Atmospheric chemistry and physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-11293-2011 · Cited by 36
Self-citationImpact of coupled NOx/aerosol aircraft emissions on ozone photochemistry and radiative forcing
Pitari, G., Iachetti, D., Di Genova, G., De Luca, N., Søvde, O., Hodnebrog, Ø., Lee, D., & Lim, L. (2015) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos6060751 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Hesstvedt, E., Hov, Ö., & Isaksen, I. S. A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Chemical Kinetics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1978-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 971-994
- ISSN
- 0538-8066 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4601
- OpenAlex
- W2166537477
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quasi‐steady‐state approximations in air pollution modeling: Comparison of two numerical schemes for oxidant prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/kin.550100907
- The paper
- Hesstvedt, E., Hov, Ö., & Isaksen, I. S. A. (1978). Quasi‐steady‐state approximations in air pollution modeling: Comparison of two numerical schemes for oxidant prediction. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550100907
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.