The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The prevalence of laryngeal pathology in a treatment‐seeking population with dysphonia
Abstract
Objectives/Hypothesis.: This article describes the prevalence of laryngeal pathology in a treatment‐seeking population with dysphonia in the Flemish part of Belgium. Study Design.: Retrospective investigation. Methods.: During a period of 5 years (2004–2008), data were collected from 882 patients who consulted with dysphonia at the ear, nose, and throat department of the University Hospital in Ghent (Belgium). Laryngeal pathology was diagnosed using videostroboscopy. Ages ranged from 4 years to 90 years. Results.: Functional voice disorders were most frequently diagnosed (30%), followed by vocal fold nodule (15%), and pharyngolaryngeal reflux (9%). The role of age, gender, and occupation was investigated. Pathologies were significantly more common in females than in males, representing 63.8% and 36.2% of the population, respectively. Professional voice users accounted for 41% of the workforce population, with teachers as main subgroup. In professional voice users, functional dysphonia occurred in 41%, vocal fold nodules in 15%, and pharyngolaryngeal reflux in 11%. Our data were compared with data from other countries. Conclusions.: Functional voice disorders were overall the most common cause of voice disorders (except in childhood), followed by vocal fold nodules and pharyngolaryngeal reflux. Professional voice users accounted for almost one half of the active population, with functional voice disorders as the main cause of dysphonia. Laryngoscope, 2010
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Muscle misuse voice disorders: description and classification
Morrison, M. D., & Rammage, L. A. (1993) · Acta Oto-Laryngologica · doi:10.3109/00016489309135839 · Cited by 319
Roy, N. (2003) · Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1097/00020840-200306000-00002 · Cited by 217
Cited by
Prevalence and causes of dysphonia in a large treatment‐seeking population
Cohen, S. M., Kim, J., Roy, N., Asche, C., & Courey, M. (2012) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.22426 · Cited by 314
Van Houtte, E., Claeys, S., Wuyts, F., & Van Lierde, K. (2011) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.04.008 · Cited by 290
Self-citationCharacterization of Primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia Using Acoustic and Aerodynamic Voice Metrics
Shembel, A. C., Lee, J., Sacher, J. R., & Johnson, A. M. (2023) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.05.019 · Cited by 27
Wang, F., & Yiu, E. M. (2024) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.10.006 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Houtte, E., Van Lierde, K., D'Haeseleer, E., & Claeys, S.
- Venue
- The Laryngoscope
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12-02
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 306-312
- ISSN
- 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2006182883
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prevalence of laryngeal pathology in a treatment‐seeking population with dysphonia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lary.20696
- The paper
- Van Houtte, E., Van Lierde, K., D'Haeseleer, E., & Claeys, S. (2010). The prevalence of laryngeal pathology in a treatment‐seeking population with dysphonia. The Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20696
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.