Cited by 25Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Carbon dioxide laser-assisted cartilage reshaping otoplasty: a new technique for prominent ears.

Ragab, Ahmed·2010·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Most otoplasty techniques are variations of suturing and sculpting concepts. Thick cartilage and its tricky everlasting reshaping is a difficult task in suture techniques. It is more difficult to predict and control the final result in cartilage sculpting techniques. Animal studies demonstrated temperature-dependent cartilage stress relaxation during laser application resulting in stable shape changes. The aim of this study was to describe a novel surgical technique of carbon dioxide laser-assisted cartilage reshaping (CO(2) LACR) otoplasty and to show its outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series study. METHODS: Sixteen patients with 32 prominent ears were involved prospectively. Carbon dioxide laser evaporation of the perichondrium and partial thickness of the medial surface of auricular cartilage and a pair of parallel laser incisions on scaphal and conchal lines were performed. The cartilage was fixed with absorbable Vicryl mattress sutures. Demographics, early and late postoperative outcomes, patients/parents and doctors satisfaction in the follow-up were studied. RESULTS: A total of 32 ears underwent repair. Patients ages ranged from 4 to 7 years (mean, 5.5 years). Average follow-up was 2.4 years. No cases required revision surgery. In late assessment 14 patients were pleased, two were satisfied, and no patients were unsatisfied. All patients had four to six of the six criteria for surgical success as defined by the study without complications. CONCLUSIONS: The present technique of CO(2) LACR otoplasty resulted in endurance of auricular appearance and symmetry, with good to satisfactory outcome to patient/parent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lary.20951

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 25

Authors
Ragab, A.
Affiliations
Menoufia University Hospitals (EG)
Corresponding author
Ragab, Ahmed
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-25
Volume
120
Issue
7
Pages
1312-1318
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W2070051602
Cited by
25
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
otoplasty, prominent ears, CO2 laser, auricular cartilage, perichondrium, laser surgery, pediatric otoplasty, patient satisfaction, surgical outcomes
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Ear Cartilage, Ear, External, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Male, Prospective Studies, Reoperation, Suture Techniques, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Lasers, Gas

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review