Cited by 180Vestibular and auditory disordersAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk factors for sudden sensorineural hearing loss in adults

Lin, Rui Jun, Krall, Randall, Westerberg, Brian D., Chadha, Neil K., Chau, Justin K.·2012·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis To review the medical literature evidence of potential risk factors for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) in the adult general population. Study design Systematic review of prospective and retrospective studies; meta-analysis of case-controlled studies. Methods Three researchers independently reviewed MEDLINE (January 1, 1950-November 30, 2010), Embase (January 1, 1980-November 30, 2010), and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews databases in addition to conducting a manual reference search. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, consecutive/nonconsecutive case series, and retrospective reviews in which a clear definition of SSNHL was stated were included in the study. Researchers individually extracted data regarding patient information and the presumed risk factors. Discrepancies were resolved by mutual consensus. Results Twenty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. Cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, increased alcohol consumption) appeared to be associated with a higher risk of developing SSNHL. A low level of serum folate may also be implicated as a risk factor. Factor V Leiden and MTHFR gene polymorphisms were found to occur more frequently in patients with SSNHL in several studies, suggesting these inherited prothrombophilic mutations could be independent risk factors of SSNHL. Conclusions Acquired and inherited cardiovascular risk factors appeared to be associated with an increased risk of developing SSNHL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lary.22480

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, R. J., Krall, R., Westerberg, B. D., Chadha, N. K., & Chau, J. K.
Affiliations
  • St. Paul's Hospital (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • BC Children's Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Chau, Justin K.
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-17
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
624-635
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W2099948065
Cited by
180
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Keywords
sudden sensorineural hearing loss, risk factors, cardiovascular risk factors, smoking, alcohol consumption, serum folate, factor V Leiden, MTHFR polymorphisms, genetic risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Hearing Loss, Sudden, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Prognosis, Risk Factors, United States, Incidence, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review