Systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk factors for sudden sensorineural hearing loss in adults
Abstract
Objectives/hypothesis To review the medical literature evidence of potential risk factors for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) in the adult general population. Study design Systematic review of prospective and retrospective studies; meta-analysis of case-controlled studies. Methods Three researchers independently reviewed MEDLINE (January 1, 1950-November 30, 2010), Embase (January 1, 1980-November 30, 2010), and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews databases in addition to conducting a manual reference search. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, consecutive/nonconsecutive case series, and retrospective reviews in which a clear definition of SSNHL was stated were included in the study. Researchers individually extracted data regarding patient information and the presumed risk factors. Discrepancies were resolved by mutual consensus. Results Twenty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. Cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, increased alcohol consumption) appeared to be associated with a higher risk of developing SSNHL. A low level of serum folate may also be implicated as a risk factor. Factor V Leiden and MTHFR gene polymorphisms were found to occur more frequently in patients with SSNHL in several studies, suggesting these inherited prothrombophilic mutations could be independent risk factors of SSNHL. Conclusions Acquired and inherited cardiovascular risk factors appeared to be associated with an increased risk of developing SSNHL.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Acquired and inherited cardiovascular risk factors were found to be associated with an increased risk of developing ISSNHL.
“Moreover, acquired and inherited cardiovascular risk factors were found to be associated with an increased risk of developing ISSNHL [33].”
From Prognostic Factors Associated with Recovery from Recurrent Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Retrospective Analysis and Systematic Review (2022) · cites this paper as [33]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jeon, S. Y., Kang, D. W., Kim, S. H., Byun, J. Y., & Yeo, S. G. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11051453 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lin, R. J., Krall, R., Westerberg, B. D., Chadha, N. K., & Chau, J. K.
- Affiliations
- St. Paul's Hospital (CA)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- BC Children's Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Chau, Justin K.
- Venue
- The Laryngoscope
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01-17
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 624-635
- ISSN
- 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2099948065
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Keywords
- sudden sensorineural hearing loss, risk factors, cardiovascular risk factors, smoking, alcohol consumption, serum folate, factor V Leiden, MTHFR polymorphisms, genetic risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Hearing Loss, Sudden, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Prognosis, Risk Factors, United States, Incidence, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review