The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Balance disorders in the elderly: Epidemiology and functional impact
Abstract
Objectives/Hypothesis: To quantify the prevalence and determine the impact of dizziness and balance disorders in the elderly. Study Design: Cross‐sectional analysis of a national database. Methods: The balance problems survey module of the 2008 National Health Interview Survey was examined, and cases of reported dizziness or balance problems in persons ≥65 years old were identified. The prevalence of balance disorders and associated symptoms and their impacts on self‐reported functional limitations were determined. The related impact on daily activities for elderly persons with balance problems was quantified. Sex‐based differences in balance problems were determined. Results: Among 37.3 ± 0.9 million elderly persons (mean age, 74.4 ± 0.1 years; 56.9% ± 0.9% female), 7.0 ± 0.2 million persons (19.6% ± 0.7%) reported a problem with dizziness or balance in the preceding 12 months. Balance problems included difficulty with unsteadiness (68.0%), walking on uneven surfaces (54.8%), vertigo (30.1%), and faintness (29.6%). Prescription medication triggered the balance problem in 18.7%. Among the 50.0% of elderly persons with balance problems who sought care, 85.6%, 30.3%, 23.9%, and 16.8% saw a general practitioner, internist, neurologist, or otolaryngologist, respectively. Of this group, 27.4% reported that balance problems specifically prevented them from participating in activities including exercise (61.2%), social events (45.8%), and driving (47.1%). Females were more likely to experience balance problems than males (21.0% vs. 17.7%, P = .025). Conclusions: Approximately one in five elderly persons experiences annual problems with dizziness or balance. Given the significant prevalence and negative effect of balance problems on daily activities in the elderly, balance disorders merit special attention, particularly in the face of an aging population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clinical Practice Guideline: Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (Update)
Bhattacharyya, N., Gubbels, S. P., Schwartz, S. R., Edlow, J. A., El‐Kashlan, H., Fife, T., Holmberg, J. M., Mahoney, K., Hollingsworth, D. B., Roberts, R., et al. (2017) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1177/0194599816689667 · Cited by 818
Self-citationStrupp, M., Kim, J.-S., Murofushi, T., Straumann, D., Jen, J. C., Rosengren, S. M., Della Santina, C. C., & Kingma, H. (2017) · Journal of Vestibular Research · doi:10.3233/ves-170619 · Cited by 592
The epidemiology of dizziness and vertigo
(2016) · Handbook of Clinical Neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63437-5.00005-4 · Cited by 518
The prevalence of voice problems among adults in the United States
Bhattacharyya, N. (2014) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.24740 · Cited by 318
Self-citationClinical Practice Guideline: Ménière’s Disease
Basura, G. J., Adams, M. E., Monfared, A., Schwartz, S. R., Antonelli, P. J., Burkard, R., Bush, M. L., Bykowski, J., Colandrea, M., Derebery, J., et al. (2020) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1177/0194599820909438 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, H. W., & Bhattacharyya, N.
- Venue
- The Laryngoscope
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05-29
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1858-1861
- ISSN
- 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2020826913
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Balance disorders in the elderly: Epidemiology and functional impact. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lary.23376
- The paper
- Lin, H. W., & Bhattacharyya, N. (2012). Balance disorders in the elderly: Epidemiology and functional impact. The Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.