Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GJB2-associated hearing loss: Systematic review of worldwide prevalence, genotype, and auditory phenotype: Systematic Review of Cx-26-Associated Hearing Loss

Chan, Dylan K., Chang, Kay W.·2014·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To perform a systematic review of GJB2-associated hearing loss to describe genotype distributions and auditory phenotype. DATA SOURCES: 230 primary studies identified from Pubmed. REVIEW METHODS: Pubmed was searched systematically to screen broadly for any study reporting on genotype and carrier frequencies for biallelic GJB2-associated hearing loss in defined populations around the world. Genotype and audiometric data were extracted and subjected to meta-analysis to determine genotype distributions, carrier frequencies, rates of asymmetric or progressive hearing loss, and imaging abnormalities. RESULTS: A total of 216 articles comprising over 43,000 hearing-loss probands were included. The prevalence of biallelic GJB2-associated hearing loss was consistent across most of the 63 countries examined, with different mutations being predominant in different countries. Common mutations were found in greater than 3% of the general population worldwide. Meta-analysis of 48 case-control studies demonstrated a two-fold higher carrier frequency among hearing-impaired individuals compared to normal-hearing controls for truncating alleles, but not V37I. Progression, asymmetry, and imaging abnormalities were present in 14% to 19% of individuals with GJB2-associated hearing loss. CONCLUSION: GJB2 mutations are highly prevalent around the world. The multiple predominant mutations present in different populations attest to the importance of this gene for normal cochlear function and suggests an evolutionary heterozygote advantage. The unusually high carrier rate for truncating mutations among hearing-impaired individuals is consistent with either the presence of complementary mutations or a carrier phenotype. The significant rate of asymmetry and progression highlights the importance of diagnostic workup and close follow-up for this highly variable condition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lary.24332

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Chan, D. K., & Chang, K. W.
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10-08
Volume
124
Issue
2
Pages
E34-E53
ISSN
0023-852X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140182429
Cited by
304
References
44
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GJB2-associated hearing loss: Systematic review of worldwide prevalence, genotype, and auditory phenotype: Systematic Review of Cx-26-Associated Hearing Loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lary.24332
The paper
Chan, D. K., & Chang, K. W. (2014). GJB2-associated hearing loss: Systematic review of worldwide prevalence, genotype, and auditory phenotype: Systematic Review of Cx-26-Associated Hearing Loss. The Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24332

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.