The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous vagal IONM prevents recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis by revealing initial EMG changes of impending neuropraxic injury: A prospective, multicenter study
Abstract
Objectives/Hypothesis: Existing intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) formats stimulate the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) intermittently, exposing it to risk for injury in between stimulations. We report electrophysiologic parameters of continuous vagal monitoring, utilizing a novel real‐time IONM format, and relate these parameters to intraoperative surgical maneuvers that delineate nascent adverse but reversible electrophysiologic parameters to prevent nerve injury. These results are correlated with postoperative vocal cord functional outcome. Study Design: Prospective multicenter tertiary study. Method: Evoked vagal nerve waveform amplitude and latency changes during 102 thyroidectomies were recorded. Adverse electrophysiologic response was categorized into 1‐concordant amplitude reduction and latency increase events (combined events) and 2‐loss of signal (LOS). Surgical maneuvers were modified when adverse electrophysiologic findings were noted. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative laryngoscopy; intraoperative electrophysiologic findings were correlated with postoperative laryngeal function. Results: Continuous vagal monitoring did not result in stimulation‐evoked nerve injury or intraoperative adverse cardiac, pulmonary, or gastrointestinal effects. Both intraoperative combined events and LOS were associated with development of vocal cord paralysis (VCP) (P = 0.001 and P >0.001 respectively). Combined events had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 33%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 97%, and were reversible in 73%. LOS had a PPV of 83%, NPV of 98%, and was reversible in only 17%. Milder combined events and isolated amplitude or latency changes were not associated with VCP. Conclusions: Continuous vagal monitoring is safe and provides real‐time RLN evaluation during surgical maneuvers. Combined events and LOS, both easily identifiable intraoperatively, are related to the development of VCP. A combined event represents a largely reversible electrophysiologic change when the associated surgical maneuver is aborted. If allowed to continue, it can advance to LOS (which typically is significantly less reversible) and to postoperative VCP. Continuous vagal monitoring has utility in identifying real‐time adverse concordant amplitude and latency changes (combined events), which can prompt modification of the associated surgical maneuver and may prevent RLN paralysis during thyroidectomy. Level of Evidence: 4. Laryngoscope, 124:1498–1505, 2014
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531595 · Cited by 22,649
A Classification of Nerve Injuries
Seddon, H. J. (1942) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.2.4260.237 · Cited by 563
Metadata
- Authors
- Phelan, E., Schneider, R., Lorenz, K., Dralle, H., Kamani, D., Potenza, A., Sritharan, N., Shin, J., & W. Randolph, G.
- Venue
- The Laryngoscope
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-02-06
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1498-1505
- ISSN
- 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4995
- OpenAlex
- W1528314829
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous vagal IONM prevents recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis by revealing initial EMG changes of impending neuropraxic injury: A prospective, multicenter study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lary.24550
- The paper
- Phelan, E., Schneider, R., Lorenz, K., Dralle, H., Kamani, D., Potenza, A., Sritharan, N., Shin, J., & W. Randolph, G. (2014). Continuous vagal IONM prevents recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis by revealing initial EMG changes of impending neuropraxic injury: A prospective, multicenter study. The Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24550
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.