Cited by 16Sinusitis and nasal conditionsNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Nasal obstruction has a limited impact on sleep quality and quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: CRS, Sleep, and QOL

Thomas, Andrew J., Orlandi, Richard R., Ashby, Shaelene, Mace, Jess C., Smith, Timothy L., Alt, Jeremiah A.·2016·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis Nasal obstruction is a cardinal symptom in diagnosing chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), and decreased sleep quality (SQ) and quality of life (QOL) are commonly reported in CRS. It is, however, unclear what role nasal obstruction severity plays in this decreased SQ and QOL. Using validated instruments, we evaluated the relationship between nasal obstruction severity, SQ, and QOL. Study design Prospective case series. Methods Patients with CRS refractory to standard medical therapy (n = 28) were prospectively enrolled and completed the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Rhinosinusitis Disability Index, and the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. CRS disease severity was evaluated with computed tomography and endoscopy. NOSE scores were compared to SQ, QOL, and disease severity measures. Spearman correlations were used to identify significant associations between measures. Results All patients reported symptomatic nasal obstruction (NOSE score ≥ 30), whereas poor sleep (PSQI ≥ 5) was reported by 82%. The NOSE sleeping subdomain correlated strongly with the PSQI total score, whereas other elements of the NOSE instrument correlated weakly or not at all with this measurement of SQ. Nasal obstruction correlated weakly with disease-specific QOL and had no correlation with the PSQI total. Conclusions Nasal obstruction appears to have a limited association with CRS-specific QOL and CRS-associated decrease in SQ. Further, the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lary.25956

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, when NO is measured with validated instruments, the correlation between NO and sleep quality is significant but weak.

    “Moreover, if NO is specifically measured with validated instruments (NOSE questionnaire, CT scan, and nasal endoscopy) in patients with CRS, the correlation between NO and sleep quality is also significant, although weak [99].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 16

Authors
Thomas, A. J., Orlandi, R. R., Ashby, S., Mace, J. C., Smith, T. L., & Alt, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Alt, Jeremiah A.
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-02
Volume
126
Issue
9
Pages
1971-1976
ISSN
0023-852X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2345636823
Cited by
16
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal obstruction, sleep quality, quality of life, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Rhinosinusitis Disability Index, disease severity, refractory sinusitis
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Rhinitis, Severity of Illness Index, Sinusitis, Sleep, Nasal Obstruction, Diagnostic Self Evaluation, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review