Nasal obstruction has a limited impact on sleep quality and quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: CRS, Sleep, and QOL
Abstract
Objectives/hypothesis Nasal obstruction is a cardinal symptom in diagnosing chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), and decreased sleep quality (SQ) and quality of life (QOL) are commonly reported in CRS. It is, however, unclear what role nasal obstruction severity plays in this decreased SQ and QOL. Using validated instruments, we evaluated the relationship between nasal obstruction severity, SQ, and QOL. Study design Prospective case series. Methods Patients with CRS refractory to standard medical therapy (n = 28) were prospectively enrolled and completed the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Rhinosinusitis Disability Index, and the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. CRS disease severity was evaluated with computed tomography and endoscopy. NOSE scores were compared to SQ, QOL, and disease severity measures. Spearman correlations were used to identify significant associations between measures. Results All patients reported symptomatic nasal obstruction (NOSE score ≥ 30), whereas poor sleep (PSQI ≥ 5) was reported by 82%. The NOSE sleeping subdomain correlated strongly with the PSQI total score, whereas other elements of the NOSE instrument correlated weakly or not at all with this measurement of SQ. Nasal obstruction correlated weakly with disease-specific QOL and had no correlation with the PSQI total. Conclusions Nasal obstruction appears to have a limited association with CRS-specific QOL and CRS-associated decrease in SQ. Further, the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, when NO is measured with validated instruments, the correlation between NO and sleep quality is significant but weak.
“Moreover, if NO is specifically measured with validated instruments (NOSE questionnaire, CT scan, and nasal endoscopy) in patients with CRS, the correlation between NO and sleep quality is also significant, although weak [99].”
From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [99]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Thomas, A. J., Orlandi, R. R., Ashby, S., Mace, J. C., Smith, T. L., & Alt, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Alt, Jeremiah A.
- Venue
- The Laryngoscope
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-05-02
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1971-1976
- ISSN
- 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2345636823
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Keywords
- chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal obstruction, sleep quality, quality of life, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Rhinosinusitis Disability Index, disease severity, refractory sinusitis
- MeSH terms
- Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Rhinitis, Severity of Illness Index, Sinusitis, Sleep, Nasal Obstruction, Diagnostic Self Evaluation, Symptom Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review