Cited by 65Vestibular and auditory disordersHearing Loss and RehabilitationHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

Quality of Life and Hearing Eight Years After Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Long Term Follow-Up of SSNHL

Härkönen, Kati, Kivekäs, Ilkka, Rautiainen, Markus, Kotti, Voitto, Vasama, Juha-Pekka·2017·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis To explore long-term hearing results, quality of life (QoL), quality of hearing (QoH), work-related stress, tinnitus, and balance problems after idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). Study design Cross-sectional study. Methods We reviewed the audiograms of 680 patients with unilateral ISSNHL on average 8 years after the hearing impairment, and then divided the patients into two study groups based on whether their ISSNHL had recovered to normal (pure tone average [PTA] ≤ 30 dB) or not (PTA > 30 dB). The inclusion criteria were a hearing threshold decrease of 30 dB or more in at least three contiguous frequencies occurring within 72 hours in the affected ear and normal hearing in the contralateral ear. Audiograms of 217 patients fulfilled the criteria. We reviewed their medical records; measured present QoL, QoH, and work-related stress with specific questionnaires; and updated the hearing status. Results Poor hearing outcome after ISSNHL was correlated with age, severity of hearing loss, and vertigo together with ISSNHL. Quality of life and QoH were statistically significantly better in patients with recovered hearing, and the patients had statistically significantly less tinnitus and balance problems. During the 8-year follow-up, the PTA of the affected ear deteriorated on average 7 dB, and healthy ear deteriorated 6 dB. Conclusion Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss that failed to recover had a negative impact on long-term QoL…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lary.26133

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a small proportion of patients progressed to Ménière's disease.

    “Only a small proportion of patients progressed to Ménière's disease. 6,10”
  • Four studies reported the improvement rate in patients with their first episode of SSNHL to be 58%-79%.

    “Four studies 6,8 -10 reported the improvement rate in patients with their first episode of SSNHL to be 58% -79%.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Härkönen, K., Kivekäs, I., Rautiainen, M., Kotti, V., & Vasama, J.-P.
Affiliations
Tampere University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
Härkönen, Kati
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-21
Volume
127
Issue
4
Pages
927-931
ISSN
0023-852X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2473783697
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Keywords
idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, quality of life, hearing recovery, long-term hearing outcomes, tinnitus, balance problems, vertigo, occupational stress, hearing deterioration, age-related hearing loss, pure-tone average
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Cross-Sectional Studies, Hearing Loss, Sudden, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glucocorticoids, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Statistics, Nonparametric, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review