Quality of Life and Hearing Eight Years After Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Long Term Follow-Up of SSNHL
Abstract
Objectives/hypothesis To explore long-term hearing results, quality of life (QoL), quality of hearing (QoH), work-related stress, tinnitus, and balance problems after idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). Study design Cross-sectional study. Methods We reviewed the audiograms of 680 patients with unilateral ISSNHL on average 8 years after the hearing impairment, and then divided the patients into two study groups based on whether their ISSNHL had recovered to normal (pure tone average [PTA] ≤ 30 dB) or not (PTA > 30 dB). The inclusion criteria were a hearing threshold decrease of 30 dB or more in at least three contiguous frequencies occurring within 72 hours in the affected ear and normal hearing in the contralateral ear. Audiograms of 217 patients fulfilled the criteria. We reviewed their medical records; measured present QoL, QoH, and work-related stress with specific questionnaires; and updated the hearing status. Results Poor hearing outcome after ISSNHL was correlated with age, severity of hearing loss, and vertigo together with ISSNHL. Quality of life and QoH were statistically significantly better in patients with recovered hearing, and the patients had statistically significantly less tinnitus and balance problems. During the 8-year follow-up, the PTA of the affected ear deteriorated on average 7 dB, and healthy ear deteriorated 6 dB. Conclusion Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss that failed to recover had a negative impact on long-term QoL…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only a small proportion of patients progressed to Ménière's disease.
“Only a small proportion of patients progressed to Ménière's disease. 6,10”
From Recurrent sudden sensorineural hearing loss—A literature review (2022) · cites this paper as [6]
Four studies reported the improvement rate in patients with their first episode of SSNHL to be 58%-79%.
“Four studies 6,8 -10 reported the improvement rate in patients with their first episode of SSNHL to be 58% -79%.”
From Recurrent sudden sensorineural hearing loss—A literature review (2022) · cites this paper as [6]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recurrent sudden sensorineural hearing loss—A literature review
Zhang, B., Wang, Y., & Chan, K. (2022) · Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology · doi:10.1002/lio2.828 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Härkönen, K., Kivekäs, I., Rautiainen, M., Kotti, V., & Vasama, J.-P.
- Affiliations
- Tampere University Hospital (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Härkönen, Kati
- Venue
- The Laryngoscope
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-06-21
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 927-931
- ISSN
- 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2473783697
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Keywords
- idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, quality of life, hearing recovery, long-term hearing outcomes, tinnitus, balance problems, vertigo, occupational stress, hearing deterioration, age-related hearing loss, pure-tone average
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Cross-Sectional Studies, Hearing Loss, Sudden, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glucocorticoids, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Statistics, Nonparametric, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review