The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil Conservation Through Sediment Trapping: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Preventing the off‐site effects of soil erosion is an essential part of good catchment management. Most efforts are in the form of on‐site soil and water conservation measures. However, sediment trapping can be an alternative (additional) measure to prevent the negative off‐site effects of soil erosion. Therefore, not all efforts should focus solely on on‐site soil conservation but also on the safe routing of sediment‐laden flows and on creating sites and conditions where sediment can be trapped. Sediment trapping can be applied on‐site and off‐site and involves both vegetative and structural measures. This paper provides an extensive review of scientific journal articles, case studies and other reports that have assessed soil conservation efforts and the sediment trapping efficacy (STE) of vegetative and structural measures. The review is further illustrated through participatory field observation and stakeholders' interview. Vegetation type and integration of two or more measures are important factors influencing STE. In this review, the STE of most measures was evaluated either individually or in such combinations. In real landscape situations, it is not only important to select the most efficient erosion control measures but also to determine their optimum location in the catchment. Hence, there is a need for research that shows a more integrated determination of STE at catchment scale. If integrated measures are implemented at the most appropriate spatial locations within a catchment where they can disconnect landscape units from each other, they will decrease runoff velocity and sediment transport and, subsequently, reduce downstream flooding and sedimentation problems. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McKergow, L. A., Weaver, D. M., Prosser, I. P., Grayson, R. B., & Reed, A. E. G. (2003) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(02)00286-x · Cited by 235
Cited by
Giger, M., Liniger, H., Sauter, C., & Schwilch, G. (2018) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.2429 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Mekonnen, M., Keesstra, S. D., Stroosnijder, L., Baartman, J. E. M., & Maroulis, J.
- Venue
- Land Degradation & Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-09-18
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 544-556
- ISSN
- 1085-3278 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-145X
- OpenAlex
- W1579768569
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 42.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil Conservation Through Sediment Trapping: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ldr.2308
- The paper
- Mekonnen, M., Keesstra, S. D., Stroosnijder, L., Baartman, J. E. M., & Maroulis, J. (2015). Soil Conservation Through Sediment Trapping: A Review. Land Degradation & Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.