Cited by 166Heavy metals in environmentEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry StudiesSoil Science and Environmental Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complexities Surrounding China's Soil Action Plan

Hou, Deyi, Li, Fasheng·2017·Land Degradation & Development

Abstract

Abstract China's soil pollution is serious, with 16·1% of all soil samples exceeding soil quality standard according to a national soil quality survey. On 31 May 2016, the Chinese government unleashed an ambitious plan to address its soil pollution problem. The large scale and fast pace of the proposed plan pose many challenges. There are biogeochemical complexities governing the fate and transport of soil contaminants that require more thorough study. There are also human‐related complexities and dynamic feedback loops, which determine the behaviour of farmers, industrial polluters, remediation practitioners and regulators. Soil pollution prevention and remediation also have externalities and spillover effects ranging from greenhouse gas emission to social justice. Rigorous policy instruments must be developed to account for complex human behaviour, to strengthen risk management and to encourage interdisciplinary scientific research. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ldr.2741

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00578-7 · DOI
  2. Ministry of Water Resource of China, 2015, China's Water Resource Bulletin
  3. USEPA, 2004, Cleaning up the Nation's Waste Sites: markets and technology trends

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–166 of 166

Metadata

Authors
Hou, D., & Li, F.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Hou, Deyi
Venue
Land Degradation & Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-30
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
2315-2320
ISSN
  • 1085-3278 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-145X
OpenAlex
W2604191068
Cited by
166
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 6
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Land Degradation and Development (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Tsinghua University
  • Recruitment Program of Global Experts
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
Keywords
soil contamination, soil remediation, soil pollution prevention, soil quality standards, biogeochemistry, policy instruments, risk management, externalities, greenhouse gas emissions, social justice, farmer behavior, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review