Cited by 119Library Science and Informationscientometrics and bibliometrics researchLibrary Science and Information Literacy

Where and how early career researchers find scholarly information

Open access
Nicholas, David, Boukacem‐Zeghmouri, Cherifa, Rodríguez‐Bravo, Blanca, Xu, Jie, Watkinson, Anthony, Abrizah, A., Herman, Eti, Świgoń, Marzena·2017·Learned Publishing

Abstract

This article presents findings from the first year of the Harbingers research project started in 2015. The project is a 3‐year longitudinal study of early career researchers (ECRs) to ascertain their current and changing habits with regard to information searching, use, sharing, and publication. The study recruited 116 researchers from seven countries (UK, USA, China, France, Malaysia, Poland, and Spain) and performed in‐depth interviews by telephone, Skype, or face‐to‐face to discover behaviours and opinions. This paper reports on findings regarding discovery and access to scholarly information. Findings confirm the universal popularity of Google/Google Scholar. Library platforms and web‐scale discovery services are largely unmentioned and unnoticed by this user community, although many ECRs pass through them unknowingly on the way to authenticated use of their other preferred sources, such as Web of Science. ECRs are conscious of the benefits of open access in delivering free access to papers. Social media are widely used as a source of discovering scholarly information. ResearchGate is popular and on the rise in all countries surveyed. Smartphones have become a regularly used platform on which to perform quick and occasional searches for scholarly information but are only rarely used for reading full text.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/leap.1087

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 119

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Archambault, E., Amyot, D., Deschamps, P., Nicol, A., Rebout, L., & Roberge, G. (2013). Proportion of open access peer-reviewed papers at the European and world levels-2004-2011 (Science-Metrix report). Montréal, Canada: Science Matrix Inc. Retrieved from http://recolecta.fecyt.es/sites/default/files/contenido/ documentos/First%20report_OA%20Peer-Review%20Papers% 202004-2011.pdf
  2. Poli, S. (2016, 10 May). The annual conference of the German Associa- tion for HE Research. [Web log post]. SRHE -The Society for Research into Higher Education Blog. Retrieved from https:// srheblog.com/2016/05/10/the-annual-conference-of-the-german- association-for-he-research/

Authors
Nicholas, D., Boukacem‐Zeghmouri, C., Rodríguez‐Bravo, B., Xu, J., Watkinson, A., Abrizah, A., Herman, E., & Świgoń, M.
Affiliations
  • National Research Tomsk State University (RU)
  • Université de Lyon Université Lyon 1 69100 Villeurbanne France
  • Biblioteconomía y Documentación Universidad de León 24071 León Castilla y León Spain
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • CIBER Research Ltd Newbury Berkshire RG147RU UK
  • University of Malaya (MY)
  • University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
Corresponding author
Nicholas, David
Venue
Learned Publishing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
19-29
ISSN
  • 0953-1513 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-4857
OpenAlex
W2563732826
Cited by
119
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
FWCI
26.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learned Publishing (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • zvestiya of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus (National Academy of Sciences of Belarus) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Publishing Research Consortium
  • National Social Science Foundation of China (15CTQ026)
  • Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (UM.C/HIR/MOHE/FCSIT/11)
  • Tomsk State University Competitiveness Improvement Program
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
early-career researchers, information discovery, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, social media in research, library platforms, Web of Science, open access, smartphones, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review