Where and how early career researchers find scholarly information
Open accessAbstract
This article presents findings from the first year of the Harbingers research project started in 2015. The project is a 3‐year longitudinal study of early career researchers (ECRs) to ascertain their current and changing habits with regard to information searching, use, sharing, and publication. The study recruited 116 researchers from seven countries (UK, USA, China, France, Malaysia, Poland, and Spain) and performed in‐depth interviews by telephone, Skype, or face‐to‐face to discover behaviours and opinions. This paper reports on findings regarding discovery and access to scholarly information. Findings confirm the universal popularity of Google/Google Scholar. Library platforms and web‐scale discovery services are largely unmentioned and unnoticed by this user community, although many ECRs pass through them unknowingly on the way to authenticated use of their other preferred sources, such as Web of Science. ECRs are conscious of the benefits of open access in delivering free access to papers. Social media are widely used as a source of discovering scholarly information. ResearchGate is popular and on the rise in all countries surveyed. Smartphones have become a regularly used platform on which to perform quick and occasional searches for scholarly information but are only rarely used for reading full text.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Google Scholar emerged as the number one go‐to academic search engine for most academic users due to its great ease of use and performance in informational and exploratory searches.
“In fact, it was due to its great ease of use and performance in informational and exploratory searches78 that Google Scholar emerged as the number one go‐to academic search engine for most academic users.79, 80, 81, 82”
Today, news articles, blogs, and social media are a valuable source of information about new research, particularly for younger scientists.
“Today, news articles, blogs, and social media are a valuable source of information about new research, particularly for younger scientists (69, 70).”
From Misinformation in and about science (2021) · cites this paper as [70]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 119
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Archambault, E., Amyot, D., Deschamps, P., Nicol, A., Rebout, L., & Roberge, G. (2013). Proportion of open access peer-reviewed papers at the European and world levels-2004-2011 (Science-Metrix report). Montréal, Canada: Science Matrix Inc. Retrieved from http://recolecta.fecyt.es/sites/default/files/contenido/ documentos/First%20report_OA%20Peer-Review%20Papers% 202004-2011.pdf
- Poli, S. (2016, 10 May). The annual conference of the German Associa- tion for HE Research. [Web log post]. SRHE -The Society for Research into Higher Education Blog. Retrieved from https:// srheblog.com/2016/05/10/the-annual-conference-of-the-german- association-for-he-research/
- Authors
- Nicholas, D., Boukacem‐Zeghmouri, C., Rodríguez‐Bravo, B., Xu, J., Watkinson, A., Abrizah, A., Herman, E., & Świgoń, M.
- Affiliations
- National Research Tomsk State University (RU)
- Université de Lyon Université Lyon 1 69100 Villeurbanne France
- Biblioteconomía y Documentación Universidad de León 24071 León Castilla y León Spain
- Wuhan University (CN)
- CIBER Research Ltd Newbury Berkshire RG147RU UK
- University of Malaya (MY)
- University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Nicholas, David
- ORCID
- Venue
- Learned Publishing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-29
- ISSN
- 0953-1513 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-4857
- OpenAlex
- W2563732826
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 26.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Learned Publishing (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- zvestiya of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus (National Academy of Sciences of Belarus) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Publishing Research Consortium
- National Social Science Foundation of China (15CTQ026)
- Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (UM.C/HIR/MOHE/FCSIT/11)
- Tomsk State University Competitiveness Improvement Program
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Keywords
- early-career researchers, information discovery, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, social media in research, library platforms, Web of Science, open access, smartphones, cross-national comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review