The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making materials accessible to students in higher education institutes: Institutional obligations, methods of compliance, and recommendations for future action.
Open accessAbstract
Key points: Current publishing restrictions cause duplicated – and wasted – effort to delivery of accessible information to students. Universities have a legal obligation to provide access, but this is not required from publishers. Initiatives to support access are helpful, but do not completely resolve the accessibility problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“For students using e-books this means that they will be able to participate more actively in class (Axelrod, 2018).”
From The EU Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive and the implications for Digital Teaching and Learning Materials (2022) · cites this paper as Axelrod, 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Postsecondary Education for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Synthesis of the Literature
Mull, C. A., Sitlington, P. L., & Alper, S. (2001) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440290106800106 · Cited by 132
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Book Industry Study Group, 2016, The BISG quick start guide to accessible publishing
- Cortiella C., 2014, The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues
- Wood L. C., 2017, Libraries: Take AIM!: Accessible instructional material and higher education
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marcus-Quinn, A. (2022) · Routledge Open Research · doi:10.12688/routledgeopenres.17581.1 · Cited by 8
“For students using e-books this means that they will be able to participate more actively in class (Axelrod, 2018).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Axelrod, J.
- Affiliations
- Northern Arizona University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Axelrod, Jamie
- Venue
- Learned Publishing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-44
- ISSN
- 0953-1513 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-4857
- OpenAlex
- W2786632814
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Learned Publishing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Education › Open Education and E-Learning
- Keywords
- higher education, institutional responsibility, legal obligations, compliance method, academic libraries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
