Cited by 8Spectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

Assessment of bioactive compounds in faba bean using infrared spectroscopy

Open access
Johnson, Joel B., Walsh, Kerry B., Naiker, Mani·2023·Legume Science

Abstract

Faba bean (Vicia faba) is growing in popularity in Australia, partly due to its higher levels of health‐benefiting compounds compared to other grain crops. This study investigated infrared spectroscopy for predicting levels of bioactive compounds such as antioxidants and phenolics in faba bean flour. Calibration models were performed on 60 samples of faba bean, comprising 10 varieties grown across two field locations in 1 year. For model validation, an independent test set comprising the same varieties grown in a different year was utilised. Near‐infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) showed promise for the prediction of total phenolic content, with an R 2pred of 0.66 and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 76 mg/100 g. Similarly, prediction of ferric reducing antioxidant power, a measure of antioxidant activity, gave an R 2pred of 0.59 and RMSEP of 87 mg/100 g. Additionally, moving window optimisation was used to determine the most important wavelength region for the prediction of these analytes. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy did not yield any suitable models for the analytes investigated. Although the NIRS models developed were not capable of exactly quantifying phenolic or antioxidant content, infrared spectroscopy appears useful for rapidly discriminating between samples containing high and low levels of phenolics or antioxidant compounds. With further refinement, this technique could potentially be applied for the quality assurance of phenolic content or antioxidant capacity in faba bean seeds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/leg3.203

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The samples analyzed in this study exhibited a phenolic profile similar to those previously reported, with quantitative differences depending on cultivation conditions.

    “Regarding the characterization of polyphenols, the samples analyzed in this study exhibited a phenolic profile similar to those previously reported (Valente et al., 2018; Johnson et al., 2021), with quantitative differences depending on cultivation conditions.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, J. B., Walsh, K. B., & Naiker, M.
Affiliations
Central Queensland University (AU)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Joel B.
Venue
Legume Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-08-17
Volume
5
Issue
4
ISSN
2639-6181 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386009744
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Legume Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Central Queensland University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
Vicia faba, near-infrared spectroscopy, bioactive compounds, total phenolic content, antioxidant activity, ferric reducing antioxidant power, faba bean flour, calibration models, FTIR spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review