The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vector Space Models of Word Meaning and Phrase Meaning: A Survey
Abstract
Distributional models represent a word through the contexts in which it has been observed. They can be used to predict similarity in meaning, based on the distributional hypothesis, which states that two words that occur in similar contexts tend to have similar meanings. Distributional approaches are often implemented in vector space models. They represent a word as a point in high‐dimensional space, where each dimension stands for a context item, and a word's coordinates represent its context counts. Occurrence in similar contexts then means proximity in space. In this survey we look at the use of vector space models to describe the meaning of words and phrases: the phenomena that vector space models address, and the techniques that they use to do so. Many word meaning phenomena can be described in terms of semantic similarity: synonymy, priming, categorization, and the typicality of a predicate's arguments. But vector space models can do more than just predict semantic similarity. They are a very flexible tool, because they can make use of all of linear algebra, with all its data structures and operations. The dimensions of a vector space can stand for many things: context words, or non‐linguistic context like images, or properties of a concept. And vector space models can use matrices or higher‐order arrays instead of vectors for representing more complex relationships. Polysemy is a tough problem for distributional approaches, as a representation that is learned from all of a word's contexts will conflate the different senses of the word. It can be addressed, using either clustering or vector combination techniques. Finally, we look at vector space models for phrases, which are usually constructed by combining word vectors. Vector space models for phrases can predict phrase similarity, and some argue that they can form the basis for a general‐purpose representation framework for natural language semantics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944937 · Cited by 32,337
Indexing by latent semantic analysis
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::aid-asi1>3.0.co;2-9 · Cited by 12,751
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25
Zhang, Y., Sutton, C. A., Storkey, A., & Zoubin Ghahramani, A. (2012) · Cited by 12,653
Introduction to Information Retrieval
Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809071 · Cited by 11,288
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.211 · Cited by 6,282
Barsalou, L. W. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 · Cited by 5,936 · cited 1×
“Theories of embodied cognition propose that concepts are organized in the brain based on their sensory and motor properties, and that simulation of actions and perceptions in the brain plays a central role in cognition (Barsalou 2008).”
BackgroundHarris, Z. S. (1954) · WORD · doi:10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520 · Cited by 4,807
Hall, R., Wittgenstein, L., & Anscombe, G. E. M. (1967) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2217461 · Cited by 3,995
(2000) · CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · doi:10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993 · Cited by 3,024
From Frequency to Meaning: Vector Space Models of Semantics
Turney, P. D., & Pantel, P. (2010) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.2934 · Cited by 2,866
Cited by
A Convolutional Neural Network for Modelling Sentences
Kalchbrenner, N., Grefenstette, E., & Blunsom, P. (2014) · Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1062 · Cited by 3,601
From Word To Sense Embeddings: A Survey on Vector Representations of Meaning
Camacho-Collados, J., & Pilehvar, M. T. (2018) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.11259 · Cited by 363
On staying grounded and avoiding quixotic dead ends
Barsalou, L. W. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1028-3 · Cited by 331
Dissociating language and thought in large language models
Mahowald, K., Ivanova, A. A., Blank, I. A., Kanwisher, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Fedorenko, E. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.01.011 · Cited by 345
Impact of word embedding models on text analytics in deep learning environment: a review
Asudani, D. S., Nagwani, N. K., & Singh, P. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10419-1 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Erk, K.
- Venue
- Language and Linguistics Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 635-653
- ISSN
- 1749-818X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1597195725
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 23.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vector Space Models of Word Meaning and Phrase Meaning: A Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lnco.362
- The paper
- Erk, K. (2012). Vector Space Models of Word Meaning and Phrase Meaning: A Survey. Language and Linguistics Compass. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnco.362
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.