Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 416

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ultraviolet laser‐induced fluorescence of colonic tissue: Basic biology and diagnostic potential

Schomacker, Kevin T., Frisoli, Joan K., Compton, Carolyn C., Flotte, Thomas J., Richter, James M., Nishioka, Norman S., Deutsch, Thomas F.·1992·Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

Abstract

Laser‐induced fluorescence (LIF) of colonic tissue was examined both in vitro and in vivo to assess the ability of the technique to distinguish neoplastic from hyperplastic and normal tissue and to relate the LIF spectra to specific constituents of the colon. Spectra from 86 normal colonic sites, 35 hyperplastic polyps, 49 adenomatous polyps, and 7 adenocarcinomas were recorded both in vivo and in vitro. With 337‐nm excitation, the fluorescence spectra all had peaks at 390 and 460 nm, believed to arise from collagen and NADH, and a minimum at 425 nm, consistent with absorption attributable to hemoglobin. The spectra of colonic tissue recorded both in vivo and in vitro are different, primarily in the NADH fluorescence component, which decays exponentially with time after resection. When normal colonic tissue is compared to hyperplastic or adenomatous polyps, the predominant changes in the fluorescence spectra are a decrease in collagen fluorescence and a slight increase in hemoglobin reabsorption. A multivariate linear regression (MVLR) analysis was used to distinguish neoplastic tissue from non‐neoplastic tissue with a sensitivity, specificity, predictive value positive, and predictive value negative toward neoplastic tissue of 80%, 92%, 82%, and 91%, respectively. When the MVLR technique was used to distinguish neoplastic polyps from non‐neoplastic polyps, values of 86%, 77%, 86%, and 77% respectively, were obtained. The data suggest that the LIF measurements sense changes in polyp morphology, rather than changes in fluorophores specific to polyps, and it is this change in morphology that leads indirectly to discrimination of polyps.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lsm.1900120111

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 416

Metadata

Authors
Schomacker, K. T., Frisoli, J. K., Compton, C. C., Flotte, T. J., Richter, J. M., Nishioka, N. S., & Deutsch, T. F.
Venue
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
63-78
ISSN
  • 0196-8092 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9101
OpenAlex
W2040708168
Cited by
416
References
0
FWCI
11.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultraviolet laser‐induced fluorescence of colonic tissue: Basic biology and diagnostic potential. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lsm.1900120111
The paper
Schomacker, K. T., Frisoli, J. K., Compton, C. C., Flotte, T. J., Richter, J. M., Nishioka, N. S., & Deutsch, T. F. (1992). Ultraviolet laser‐induced fluorescence of colonic tissue: Basic biology and diagnostic potential. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900120111

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.