The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Power density and exposure time of He‐Ne laser irradiation are more important than total energy dose in photo‐biomodulation of human fibroblasts in vitro
Abstract
The absorption spectrum of human fibroblast monolayers showed several absorption peaks, among them one at a wavelength of 630 nm. Cultures of these fibroblasts were subjected to He‐Ne laser (632.8 nm) irradiation of various energy doses by varying power density and exposure time. On three consecutive days the cell monolayers were irradiated for periods between 0.5 and 10 min. Laser power varied from 0.55 to 5.98 mW. Both cell number and collagen type I production were determined for each irradiation condition within one experiment. Results show that laser power below 2.91 mW could enhance cell proliferation (as determined by cell counting), whereas higher laser power (5.98 mW) had no effect. Stimulatory effects were most pronounced at irradiation times between 0.5 and 2 min. Collagen type I production (as determined by an ELISA) was affected in the opposite direction to cell proliferation: when the cell proliferation was increased, collagen type I production was decreased. From these experiments it is clear that exposure time and power density determine the effects of laser irradiation. Both stimulation and inhibition of the observed cell properties can be obtained with the same laser on the same cells. © 1992 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exact Action Spectra for Cellular Responses Relevant to Phototherapy
Karu, T. I., & Kolyakov, S. F. (2005) · Photomedicine and Laser Surgery · doi:10.1089/pho.2005.23.355 · Cited by 615
Ozawa, Y., Shimizu, N., Kariya, G., & Abiko, Y. (1998) · Bone · doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(97)00294-9 · Cited by 331
Bjordal, J. M., Lopes-Martins, R. A., Joensen, J., Couppe, C., Ljunggren, A. E., Stergioulas, A., & Johnson, M. I. (2008) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-75 · Cited by 300
Low-Intensity Laser Therapy: A Review
Schindl, A., Schindl, M., Pernerstorfer-Schön, H., & Schindl, L. (2000) · Journal of Investigative Medicine · doi:10.1177/108155890004800506 · Cited by 280
Hawkins, D., & Abrahamse, H. (2006) · Photomedicine and Laser Surgery · doi:10.1089/pho.2006.24.705 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- van Breugel, H. H. F. I., & Bär, P. R. D.
- Venue
- Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 528-537
- ISSN
- 0196-8092 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9101
- OpenAlex
- W2143009354
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power density and exposure time of He‐Ne laser irradiation are more important than total energy dose in photo‐biomodulation of human fibroblasts in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lsm.1900120512
- The paper
- van Breugel, H. H. F. I., & Bär, P. R. D. (1992). Power density and exposure time of He‐Ne laser irradiation are more important than total energy dose in photo‐biomodulation of human fibroblasts in vitro. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900120512
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.