Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The prevalence and risk factors of post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation after fractional resurfacing in Asians

Chan, Henry H.L., Manstein, D., Yu, C.S., Shek, S., Kono, T., Wei, W.I.·2007·Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

Abstract

Background: Ablative laser resurfacing is considered to be the main therapeutic option for the treatment of wrinkles and acne scarring. However, in Asians, post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) is a common adverse effect of laser resurfacing. Fractional resurfacing is a new concept of skin rejuvenation whereby zones of micro thermal injury are generated in the skin with the use of a 1,540‐nm laser. The risk and prevalence of hyperpigmentation in dark‐skinned patients using this approach have not been studied. Objective: To assess the prevalence and risk factors of PIH that is associated with the use of fractional resurfacing in Asians. Method: A retrospective study of 37 Chinese patients who were treated with fractional resurfacing for acne scarring, skin rejuvenation, and pigmentation was carried out. In all of the cases, pre‐ and post‐treatment clinical photographs (from standardized and cross‐polarized views) were taken using the Canfield CR system. Two independent observers assessed the photographs. A prospective study of treatments of nine different density and energy levels that were applied to the forearms of 18 volunteers was also performed. Clinical photographs were assessed pre‐ and post‐treatment for evidence of PIH. Result: In the retrospective study, 119 treatment sessions were performed. Sixty‐eight treatment sessions were high energy, low density; 51 sessions were low energy, high density. Patients who underwent a high energy but low‐density treatment (range of energy 7–20 mJ; average energy 16.3 mJ, 1,000 MTZ) were associated with a lower prevalence of generalized PIH (7.1% vs. 12.4%) than those who underwent a low energy but high‐density (range of energy 6–12 mJ; average energy 8.2 mJ, 2,000 MTZ) treatment. However, the difference was not statistically significant. Localized PIH occurred in the peri‐oral area among patients who did not receive air cooling as an adjunctive therapy. Conclusion: Both the density and energy of the treatment determines the risk of PIH in dark‐skinned patients. Density may be of more important but further studies are necessary to determine this. Cooling to prevent bulk tissue heating is also important, especially in small anatomical areas. By using adequate parameters, the risk of PIH in dark‐skinned patients can be significantly reduced. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lsm.20512

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 209

Metadata

Authors
Chan, H. H. L., Manstein, D., Yu, C. S., Shek, S., Kono, T., & Wei, W. I.
Venue
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05-22
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
381-385
ISSN
  • 0196-8092 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9101
OpenAlex
W2153207157
Cited by
209
References
0
FWCI
12.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prevalence and risk factors of post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation after fractional resurfacing in Asians. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lsm.20512
The paper
Chan, H. H. L., Manstein, D., Yu, C. S., Shek, S., Kono, T., & Wei, W. I. (2007). The prevalence and risk factors of post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation after fractional resurfacing in Asians. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20512

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.