Efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon placement for weight loss in patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation
Abstract
and on the waiting list for IGB placement endoscopically for a maximum of 6 months. A total of 8 patients (7 men) aged mean ± SD, 56 ± 4.6 years with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium (MELD-Na) scores 14.1 ± 3.4 experienced weight reduction (146 ± 22.2 kg versus 127 ± 21.6 kg [P = 0.005] with IGB in place and 130 ± 24.6 kg [P = 0.014] at 6 months), with a total body weight loss of 12.2% ± 8.8% with IGBs in place and 10.9% ± 8.9% at 6 months. Body fat decreased from 48.6% ± 5.8% to 40.6% ± 6.4% (P = 0.001) and lean mass increased from 51.3% ± 6% to 59.4% ± 6.4% (P = 0.001). No change in MELD-Na scores occurred (P = 0.770). Early balloon retrieval was attributed to accommodative symptoms (n = 2) and liver decompensation (n = 1). Mallory Weiss tears (n = 3), but no portal hypertensive bleeding, occurred. Liver decompensation and/or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) developed in 3 patients. A total of 4 patients with LT ± sleeve gastrectomy maintained overall weight loss. Of 4 patients who did not receive transplants, 2 experienced weight regain. IGB results in short-term weight loss in patients with cirrhosis awaiting LT, with body fat loss without lean mass loss. Adverse effects were common. Decompensation and HCC did occur, with uncertainty of the relation to weight loss, and thus careful patient selection and close follow-up are required.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Very small series have reported proof of principle of feasibility of endoscopic bariatric techniques in select individuals with mean weight loss of 11% at 6 months.
“Very small series have been reported to date, providing proof of principle of feasibility in select individuals with mean weight loss of 11% at 6 months. 502”
From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [502]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Watt, K. D., Heimbach, J. K., Rizk, M., Jaruvongvanich, P., Sanchez, W., Port, J., Venkatesh, S. K., Bamlet, H., Tiedtke, K., Malhi, H., Acosta Cardenas, A., Grothe, K., Clark, M., Mundi, M. S., & Abu Dayyeh, B. K.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,Mayo Clinic,Rochester,MN
- Corresponding author
- Watt, Kymberly D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Liver Transplantation
- Published
- 2021-07-26
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1239-1247
- ISSN
- 1527-6465 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-6473
- OpenAlex
- W3152886412
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Liver Transplantation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Mayo Clinic
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK114460)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- liver cirrhosis, weight loss, bariatric intervention, MELD-Na, hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, Mallory-Weiss tear, fat loss, sleeve gastrectomy, weight regain
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Weight Loss, Gastric Balloon, Liver Transplantation, End Stage Liver Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review