The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biomimetic Polymer/Apatite Composite Scaffolds for Mineralized Tissue Engineering
Abstract
Summary: The material surface must be considered in the design of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering so that it supports bone cells adhesion, proliferation and differentiation. A biomimetic approach has been developed as a 3D surface modification technique to grow partially carbonated hydroxyapatite (the bonelike mineral) in prefabricated, porous, polymer scaffolds using a simulated body fluid in our lab. For the rational design of scaffolding materials and optimization of the biomimetic process, this work focused on various materials and processing parameters in relation to apatite formation on 3D polymer scaffolds. The apatite nucleation and growth in the internal pores of poly(L‐lactide) and poly(D,L‐lactide) scaffolds were significantly faster than in those of poly(lactide‐co‐glycolide) scaffolds in simulated body fluids. The apatite distribution was significantly more uniform in the poly(L‐lactide) scaffolds than in the poly(lactide‐co‐glycolide) scaffolds. After incubation in a simulated body fluid for 30 d, the mass of poly(L‐lactide) scaffolds increased approximately 40%, whereas the mass of the poly(lactide‐co‐glycolide) scaffolds increased by about 15% (see Figure). A higher ionic concentration and higher pH value of the simulated body fluid enhanced apatite formation. The effects of surface functional groups on apatite nucleation and growth were found to be more complex in 3D scaffolds than on 2D films. Surprisingly enough, it was found that carboxyl groups significantly reduced the apatite formation, especially on the internal pore surfaces of 3D scaffolds. These findings are critically important in the rational selection of materials and surface design of 3D scaffolds for mineralized tissue engineering and may contribute to the understanding of biomineralization as well. SEM micrograph of a poly(L‐lactide) scaffold. imageSEM micrograph of a poly(L‐lactide) scaffold.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering
Ma, P. X. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.041 · Cited by 1,310
Self-citationScaffolds for tissue fabrication
Ma, P. X. (2004) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(04)00233-0 · Cited by 1,077
Self-citationNew emerging trends in synthetic biodegradable polymers—Polylactide: A critique
Gupta, A. P., & Kumar, V. (2007) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.06.045 · Cited by 941
Targeted therapy in chronic diseases using nanomaterial-based drug delivery vehicles
Singh, A. P., Biswas, A., Shukla, A., & Maiti, P. (2019) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-019-0068-3 · Cited by 645
Sun, F., Zhou, H., & Lee, J. (2011) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.002 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, R., & Ma, P. X.
- Venue
- Macromolecular Bioscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02-18
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 100-111
- ISSN
- 1616-5187 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-5195
- OpenAlex
- W2121977266
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomimetic Polymer/Apatite Composite Scaffolds for Mineralized Tissue Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mabi.200300017
- The paper
- Zhang, R., & Ma, P. X. (2004). Biomimetic Polymer/Apatite Composite Scaffolds for Mineralized Tissue Engineering. Macromolecular Bioscience. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200300017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.