Physico-chemical strategies to enhance stability and drug retention of polymeric micelles for tumor-targeted drug delivery
Open accessAbstract
Polymeric micelles (PM) have been extensively used for tumor‐targeted delivery of hydrophobic anti‐cancer drugs. The lipophilic core of PM is naturally suitable for loading hydrophobic drugs and the hydrophilic shell endows them with colloidal stability and stealth properties. Decades of research on PM have resulted in tremendous numbers of PM‐forming amphiphilic polymers, and approximately a dozen micellar nanomedicines have entered the clinic. The first generation of PM can be considered solubilizers of hydrophobic drugs, with short circulation times resulting from poor micelle stability and unstable drug entrapment. To more optimally exploit the potential of PM for targeted drug delivery, several physical (e.g., π–π stacking, stereocomplexation, hydrogen bonding, host–guest complexation, and coordination interaction) and chemical (e.g., free radical polymerization, click chemistry, disulfide and hydrazone bonding) strategies have been developed to improve micelle stability and drug retention. In this review, the most promising physico‐chemical approaches to enhance micelle stability and drug retention are described, and how these strategies have resulted in systems with promising therapeutic efficacy in animal models, paving the way for clinical translation, is summarized. image
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Additional molecular interactions in the core, such as hydrogen bonding and pi-pi interactions, can strengthen polymer-drug interactions.
“Additional molecular interactions existing in the core, such as hydrogen bonding and pi-pi interactions, are no less significant as they can strengthen the molecular interactions between the polymer and the drug in the core [28, 39].”
From Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: From nanoformulation to clinical approval. (2020) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 106 · Cited by 174
Research works printed but not linked: 104
- [1]1. O. C. Farokhzad, R. Langer, ACS Nano 2009, 3, 16.
- [2]2. T. Lammers, F. Kiessling, W. E. Hennink, G. Storm, J. Con- trolled Release 2012, 161, 175.
- [3]3. Y. H. Bae, K. Park, J. Controlled Release 2011, 153, 198.
- [4]4. J. Fang, H. Nakamura, H. Maeda, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2011, 63, 136.
- [5]5. V. P. Torchilin, AAPS J. 2007, 9, E128.
- [6]6. M. C. Jones, J. C. Leroux, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 1999, 48, 101.
- [7]7. K. Kataoka, A. Harada, Y. Nagasaki, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2001, 47, 113.
- [8]8. C. Oerlemans, W. Bult, M. Bos, G. Storm, J. F. W. Nijsen, W. E. Hennink, Pharm. Res. 2010, 27, 2569.
- [9]9. S. Eetezadi, S. N. Ekdawi, C. Allen, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2015, 91, 7.
- [11]11. C. E. Wang, P. S. Stayton, S. H. Pun, A. J. Convertine, J. Con- trolled Release 2015, 219, 345.
- [12]12. S. Kim, Y. Shi, J. Y. Kim, K. Park, J. X. Cheng, Expert Opin. Drug Delivery 2010, 7, 49.
- [13]13. M. Talelli, M. Barz, C. J. Rijcken, F. Kiessling, W. E. Hennink, T. Lammers, Nano Today 2015, 10, 93.
- [14]14. H. Chen, S. Kim, W. He, H. Wang, P. S. Low, K. Park, J. X. Cheng, Langmuir 2008, 24, 5213.
- [15]15. I. K. Kwon, S. C. Lee, B. Han, K. Park, J. Controlled Release 2012, 164, 108.
- [16]16. R. Savić, T. Azzam, A. Eisenberg, D. Maysinger, Langmuir 2006, 22, 3570.
- [17]17. E. A. Meyer, R. K. Castellano, F. Diederich, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1210.
- [18]18. H. Cabral, K. Kataoka, J. Controlled Release 2014, 190, 465.
- [19]19. T. Nakanishi, S. Fukushima, K. Okamoto, M. Suzuki, Y. Matsumura, M. Yokoyama, T. Okano, Y. Sakurai, K. Kataoka, J. Controlled Release 2001, 74, 295.
- [20]20. T. Hamaguchi, Y. Matsumura, M. Suzuki, K. Shimizu, R. Goda, I. Nakamura, I. Nakatomi, M. Yokoyama, K. Kataoka, T. Kakizoe, Br. J. Cancer 2005, 92, 1240.
- [21]21. F. Koizumi, M. Kitagawa, T. Negishi, T. Onda, S. I. Matsumoto, T. Hamaguchi, Y. Matsumura, Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 10048.
- [22]22. M. Harada, I. Bobe, H. Saito, N. Shibata, R. Tanaka, T. Hayashi, Y. Kato, Cancer Sci. 2011, 102, 192.
- [23]23. A. Takahashi, Y. Yamamoto, M. Yasunaga, Y. Koga, J. i. Kuroda, M. Takigahira, M. Harada, H. Saito, T. Hayashi, Y. Kato, Cancer Sci. 2013, 104, 920.
- [24]24. M. G. Carstens, J. J. Bevernage, C. F. van Nostrum, M. J. van Steenbergen, F. M. Flesch, R. Verrijk, L. G. de Leede, D. J. Crommelin, W. E. Hennink, Macromolecules 2007, 40, 116.
- [25]25. Y. Shi, M. J. van Steenbergen, E. A. Teunissen, L. s. Novo, S. Gradmann, M. Baldus, C. F. van Nostrum, W. E. Hennink, Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 1826.
- [26]26. Y. Shi, R. van der Meel, B. Theek, E. O. Blenke, E. H. Pieters, M. H. Fens, J. Ehling, R. M. Schiffelers, G. Storm, C. F. van Nostrum, ACS Nano 2015, 9, 3740.
- [27]27. C. J. Rijcken, C. J. Snel, R. M. Schiffelers, C. F. van Nostrum, W. E. Hennink, Biomaterials 2007, 28, 5581.
- [28]28. T. Fox, B. Garrett, W. Goode, S. Gratch, J. Kincaid, A. Spell, J. Stroupe, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1768.
- [29]29. S. J. de Jong, W. N. E. van Dijk-Wolthuis, J. J. Kettenes-van den Bosch, P. J. W. Schuyl, W. E. Hennink, Macromolecules 1998, 31, 6397.
- [30]30. H. Tsuji, Macromol. Biosci. 2005, 5, 569.
- [31]31. N. Kang, M. E. Perron, R. E. Prud'Homme, Y. Zhang, G. Gaucher, J. C. Leroux, Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 315.
- [32]32. Z. Zhao, Z. Zhang, L. Chen, Y. Cao, C. He, X. Chen, Langmuir 2013, 29, 13072.
- [33]33. S. H. Kim, J. P. K. Tan, F. Nederberg, K. Fukushima, Y. Y. Yang, R. M. Waymouth, J. L. Hedrick, Macromolecules 2009, 42, 25.
- [34]34. R. M. Versteegen, R. P. Sijbesma, E. Meijer, Macromolecules 2005, 38, 3176.
- [35]35. S. H. Kim, J. P. Tan, F. Nederberg, K. Fukushima, J. Colson, C. Yang, A. Nelson, Y. Y. Yang, J. L. Hedrick, Biomaterials 2010, 31, 8063.
- [36]36. F. van de Manakker, T. Vermonden, C. F. van Nostrum, W. E. Hennink, Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 3157.
- [37]37. X. J. Loh, Mater. Horiz. 2014, 1, 185.
- [38]38. J. Wang, M. Jiang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3703.
- [39]39. C. Tu, L. Zhu, P. Li, Y. Chen, Y. Su, D. Yan, X. Zhu, G. Zhou, Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6063.
- [40]40. M. Iijima, Y. Nagasaki, T. Okada, M. Kato, K. Kataoka, Mac- romolecules 1999, 32, 1140.
- [41]41. X. Shuai, T. Merdan, A. K. Schaper, F. Xi, T. Kissel, Bioconju- gate Chem. 2004, 15, 441.
- [42]42. D. Neradovic, O. Soga, C. Van Nostrum, W. Hennink, Bioma- terials 2004, 25, 2409.
- [43]43. H. C. Kolb, M. Finn, K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004.
- [44]44. M. Van Dijk, D. T. Rijkers, R. M. Liskamp, C. F. van Nostrum, W. E. Hennink, Bioconjugate Chem. 2009, 20, 2001.
- [45]45. Y. Jiang, J. Chen, C. Deng, E. J. Suuronen, Z. Zhong, Biomate- rials 2014, 35, 4969.
- [46]46. M. J. Joralemon, R. K. O'Reilly, C. J. Hawker, K. L. Wooley, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16892.
- [47]47. R. K. O'Reilly, M. J. Joralemon, K. L. Wooley, C. J. Hawker, Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 5976.
- [48]48. S. M. Garg, X. B. Xiong, C. Lu, A. Lavasanifar, Macromol- ecules 2011, 44, 2058.
- [49]49. Y. Shi, R. M. Cardoso, C. F. van Nostrum, W. E. Hennink, Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 2048.
- [50]50. J. Ma, J. W. Bartels, Z. Li, K. Zhang, C. Cheng, K. L. Wooley, Aust. J. Chem. 2010, 63, 1159.
- [51]51. H. T. Duong, V. T. Huynh, P. de Souza, M. H. Stenzel, Biomac- romolecules 2010, 11, 2290.
- [52]52. P. V. Chang, J. A. Prescher, E. M. Sletten, J. M. Baskin, I. A. Miller, N. J. Agard, A. Lo, C. R. Bertozzi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 1821.
- [53]53. H. Kadokura, F. Katzen, J. Beckwith, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2003, 72, 111.
- [54]54. Y. Kakizawa, A. Harada, K. Kataoka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11247.
- [55]55. F. Meng, W. E. Hennink, Z. Zhong, Biomaterials 2009, 30, 2180.
- [56]56. L. Brülisauer, M. A. Gauthier, J. C. Leroux, J. Controlled Release 2014, 195, 147.
- [57]57. Y. L. Li, L. Zhu, Z. Liu, R. Cheng, F. Meng, J. H. Cui, S. J. Ji, Z. Zhong, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9914.
- [58]58. R. Wei, L. Cheng, M. Zheng, R. Cheng, F. Meng, C. Deng, Z. Zhong, Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 2429.
- [59]59. Y. Xu, F. Meng, R. Cheng, Z. Zhong, Macromol. Biosci. 2009, 9, 1254.
- [60]60. J. Dai, S. Lin, D. Cheng, S. Zou, X. Shuai, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 9404.
- [61]61. Y. C. Wang, Y. Li, T. M. Sun, M. H. Xiong, J. Wu, Y. Y. Yang, J. Wang, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31, 1201.
- [62]62. Y. Li, K. Xiao, J. Luo, W. Xiao, J. S. Lee, A. M. Gonik, J. Kato, T. A. Dong, K. S. Lam, Biomaterials 2011, 32, 6633. (11 of 11) 1600160
- [63]63. M. Hrubý, C ˇ. Kon ˇák, K. Ulbrich, J. Controlled Release 2005, 103, 137.
- [64]64. K. Ulbrich, V. R. Šubr, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2004, 56, 1023.
- [65]65. F. Kratz, U. Beyer, M. T. Schutte, Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 1999, 1, 16.
- [66]66. Y. Shi, C. F. van Nostrum, W. E. Hennink, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 1, 393.
- [67]67. N. Bertrand, J. C. Leroux, J. Controlled Release 2012, 161, 152.
- [68]68. P. Zou, H. Chen, H. J. Paholak, D. Sun, Mol. Pharm. 2013, 10, 4185.
- [69]69. C. Rijcken, Degree Thesis, Utrecht University, 2007.
- [70]70. K. Letchford, H. M. Burt, Mol. Pharm. 2012, 9, 248.
- [71]71. A. Grothey, R. M. Goldberg, Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2004, 5, 2159.
- [72]72. E. Wong, C. M. Giandomenico, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2451.
- [73]73. N. Nishiyama, Y. Kato, Y. Sugiyama, K. Kataoka, Pharm. Res. 2001, 18, 1035.
- [74]74. N. Nishiyama, S. Okazaki, H. Cabral, M. Miyamoto, Y. Kato, Y. Sugiyama, K. Nishio, Y. Matsumura, K. Kataoka, Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 8977.
- [75]75. Y. Mochida, H. Cabral, Y. Miura, F. Albertini, S. Fukushima, K. Osada, N. Nishiyama, K. Kataoka, ACS Nano 2014, 8, 6724.
- [76]76. R. Plummer, R. Wilson, H. Calvert, A. Boddy, M. Griffin, J. Sludden, M. Tilby, M. Eatock, D. Pearson, C. Ottley, Br. J. Cancer 2011, 104, 593.
- [77]77. H. Cabral, N. Nishiyama, K. Kataoka, J. Controlled Release 2007, 121, 146.
- [78]78. S. S. Desale, S. M. Cohen, Y. Zhao, A. V. Kabanov, T. K. Bronich, J. Controlled Release 2013, 171, 339.
- [79]79. J. P. Tan, S. H. Kim, F. Nederberg, K. Fukushima, D. J. Coady, A. Nelson, Y. Y. Yang, J. L. Hedrick, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31, 1187.
- [80]80. Y. Bae, W. D. Jang, N. Nishiyama, S. Fukushima, K. Kataoka, Mol. BioSyst. 2005, 1, 242.
- [81]81. Y. Bae, N. Nishiyama, K. Kataoka, Bioconjugate Chem. 2007, 18, 1131.
- [82]82. A. W. Alani, Y. Bae, D. A. Rao, G. S. Kwon, Biomaterials 2010, 31, 1765.
- [83]83. Z. Su, Y. Liang, Y. Yao, T. Wang, N. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 1122.
- [84]84. B. J. Crielaard, C. J. Rijcken, L. Quan, S. van der Wal, I. Altintas, M. van der Pot, J. A. Kruijtzer, R. M. Liskamp, R. M. Schiffelers, C. F. van Nostrum, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7254.
- [85]85. Q. Hu, C. J. Rijcken, R. Bansal, W. E. Hennink, G. Storm, J. Prakash, Biomaterials 2015, 53, 370.
- [86]86. D. L. Gustafson, M. E. Long, J. A. Zirrolli, M. W. Duncan, S. N. Holden, A. S. Pierson, S. G. Eckhardt, Cancer Chem- other. Pharmacol. 2003, 52, 159.
- [87]87. M. Talelli, M. Iman, A. K. Varkouhi, C. J. Rijcken, R. M. Schiffelers, T. Etrych, K. Ulbrich, C. F. van Nostrum, T. Lammers, G. Storm, Biomaterials 2010, 31, 7797.
- [88]88. M. Talelli, S. Oliveira, C. J. Rijcken, E. H. Pieters, T. Etrych, K. Ulbrich, R. C. van Nostrum, G. Storm, W. E. Hennink, T. Lammers, Biomaterials 2013, 34, 1255.
- [89]89. Q. Hu, E. V. Van Gaal, P. Brundel, H. Ippel, T. Hackeng, C. J. Rijcken, G. Storm, W. E. Hennink, J. Prakash, J. Con- trolled Release 2015, 205, 98.
- [90]90. H. Cabral, M. Nakanishi, M. Kumagai, W. D. Jang, N. Nishiyama, K. Kataoka, Pharm. Res. 2009, 26, 82.
- [91]91. S. McRae Page, M. Martorella, S. Parelkar, I. Kosif, T. Emrick, Mol. Pharm. 2013, 10, 2684.
- [92]92. H. Cabral, Y. Matsumoto, K. Mizuno, Q. Chen, M. Murakami, M. Kimura, Y. Terada, M. Kano, K. Miyazono, M. Uesaka, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 815.
- [93]93. S. Huo, H. Ma, K. Huang, J. Liu, T. Wei, S. Jin, J. Zhang, S. He, X. J. Liang, Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 319.
- [94]94. J. W. Hickey, J. L. Santos, J. M. Williford, H. Q. Mao, J. Con- trolled Release 2015, 219, 536.
- [95]95. Y. Hao, Y. Huang, Y. He, J. Peng, L. Chen, H. Xun, Z. Qian, RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 13698.
- [96]96. D. L. Stirland, Y. Matsumoto, K. Toh, K. Kataoka, Y. H. Bae, J. Controlled Release 2016, 227, 38.
- [97]97. J. Xie, S. Lee, X. Chen, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2010, 62, 1064.
- [98]98. K. Y. Choi, G. Liu, S. Lee, X. Chen, Nanoscale 2012, 4, 330.
- [99]99. L. Y. Rizzo, B. Theek, G. Storm, F. Kiessling, T. Lammers, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013, 24, 1159.
- [100]100. S. Kunjachan, J. Ehling, G. Storm, F. Kiessling, T. Lammers, Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 10907.
- [101]101. T. C. Chou, Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 440.
- [102]102. Q. Hu, W. Sun, C. Wang, Z. Gu, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2016, 98, 19.
- [103]103. M. J. Vicent, F. Greco, R. I. Nicholson, A. Paul, P. C. Griffiths, R. Duncan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 117, 4129.
- [104]104. T. Lammers, V. Subr, K. Ulbrich, P. Peschke, P. E. Huber, W. E. Hennink, G. Storm, Biomaterials 2009, 30, 3466.
- [105]105. R. Zhang, J. Yang, M. Sima, Y. Zhou, J. Kopec ˇek, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 12181.
- Authors
- Shi, Y., Lammers, T., Storm, G., & Hennink, W. E.
- Affiliations
- South China University of Technology (CN)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Hennink, Wim E.
- Venue
- Macromolecular Bioscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-07-14
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1616-5187 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-5195
- PMC
- PMC5410994
- OpenAlex
- W2461228950
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Macromolecular Bioscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Research Council (StG‐309495‐NeoNaNo, PoC‐680882‐CONQUEST, StG-309495-NeoNaNo, PoC-680882-CONQUEST)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (La2937/1‐2, La2937/1-2)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Keywords
- polymeric micelles, anticancer drug delivery, micelle stability, drug retention, hydrophobic anticancer drugs, amphiphilic polymers, π-π stacking, stereocomplexation, hydrogen bonding, host-guest complexation, coordination interactions, click chemistry, disulfide bonds, hydrazone bond, radical polymerization, clinical translation
- MeSH terms
- Pharmaceutical Preparations, Micelles, Neoplasms, Polymers, Drug Delivery Systems, Chemical Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review