CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Manufacturing Man-Made Magnetosomes: High-Throughput In Situ Synthesis of Biomimetic Magnetite Loaded Nanovesicles

Bakhshi, Poonam K., Bain, Jennifer, Gul, Mine Orlu, Stride, Eleanor, Edirisinghe, Mohan, Staniland, Sarah S.·2016·Macromolecular Bioscience
DOI 10.1002/mabi.201600181
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mabi.201600181

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Size distribution of vesicles. a) The size distribution of non-electroporated liposomes obtained by DLS. b) TEM images of the NaOH encapsulated vesicles formed at optimized conditions (200 μm diameter, 96 mm needle length, 20 μL min -1 flow rate, 16.8-17.5 kV voltage).
Figure 2 Size distribution of vesicles. a) The size distribution of non-electroporated liposomes obtained by DLS. b) TEM images of the NaOH encapsulated vesicles formed at optimized conditions (200 μm diameter, 96 mm needle length, 20 μL min -1 flow rate, 16.8-17.5 kV voltage).CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 The characterization of the iron oxide within the nanovesicles. a) Raman spectrum of artificial magnetosomes shows DSPC lipid encapsulating magnetite. Spectrum shows the presence of peaks representative of magnetite (at 230, 535, and 665 cm -1 ) and a phosphatidylcholine lipid bilayer (peaks highlighted at cm -1 and above). b) Lipophilic fluorescent dye incorporation (Bodipy), showing the presence of magnetically responsive (Figure S5, Supporting Information) liposomes.
Figure 4 The characterization of the iron oxide within the nanovesicles. a) Raman spectrum of artificial magnetosomes shows DSPC lipid encapsulating magnetite. Spectrum shows the presence of peaks representative of magnetite (at 230, 535, and 665 cm -1 ) and a phosphatidylcholine lipid bilayer (peaks highlighted at cm -1 and above). b) Lipophilic fluorescent dye incorporation (Bodipy), showing the presence of magnetically responsive (Figure S5, Supporting Information) liposomes.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Magnetic properties of the artificial magnetosomes. Magnetization measurements at 300 K. a) Magnetization versus field hysteresis plot shows the soft magnetic material characteristic of magnetite. b) ZFC and FC magnetisation versus temperature plot at 100 Oe. Inset shows remnance. The Verwey transition has been shown by -- and the temperature at which it occurs has been highlighted (118 K).
Figure 5 Magnetic properties of the artificial magnetosomes. Magnetization measurements at 300 K. a) Magnetization versus field hysteresis plot shows the soft magnetic material characteristic of magnetite. b) ZFC and FC magnetisation versus temperature plot at 100 Oe. Inset shows remnance. The Verwey transition has been shown by -- and the temperature at which it occurs has been highlighted (118 K).CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Pankhurst, 2003, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 36, R167, 10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/201 · DOI
  2. Hu, 2011, Nat. Commun., 2, 553, 10.1038/ncomms1564 · DOI
  3. Polshettiwar, 2011, Chem. Rev., 111, 3036, 10.1021/cr100230z · DOI
  4. Pankhurst, 2009, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 42, 224001, 10.1088/0022-3727/42/22/224001 · DOI
  5. Pankhurst, 2003, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 36, R167, 10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/201 · DOI
  6. Lee, 2011, Nat. Nanotechnol., 6, 418, 10.1038/nnano.2011.95 · DOI
  7. Ge, 2011, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 50, 1492, 10.1002/anie.200907091 · DOI
  8. Ho, 2011, Chem. Mater., 23, 1753, 10.1021/cm102758u · DOI
  9. Chang, 2009, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 114, B07101
  10. Regazzoni, 1981, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 43, 1489, 10.1016/0022-1902(81)80322-3 · DOI
  11. Jogler, 2009, Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 63, 501, 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162908 · DOI
  12. Blakemore, 1975, Science, 190, 377, 10.1126/science.170679 · DOI
  13. Bazylinski, 2007, Adv. Appl. Microbiol., 62, 21, 10.1016/S0065-2164(07)62002-4 · DOI
  14. Tanaka, 2011, J. Biol. Chem., 286, 6386, 10.1074/jbc.M110.183434 · DOI
  15. Tanaka, 2006, Proteomics, 6, 5234, 10.1002/pmic.200500887 · DOI
  16. Schüler, 1999, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 52, 464, 10.1007/s002530051547 · DOI
  17. Jimenez-Lopez, 2010, J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci., 115, G00G03, 10.1029/2009JG001152 · DOI
  18. Matsunaga, 1987, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 26, 328, 10.1007/BF00256663 · DOI
  19. Matsunaga, 2007, Trends Biotechnol., 25, 182, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.02.002 · DOI
  20. Tanaka, 2012, J. Mater. Chem., 22, 11919, 10.1039/c2jm31520c · DOI
  21. Staniland, 2008, Nat. Nanotechnol., 3, 158, 10.1038/nnano.2008.35 · DOI
  22. Alphandéry, 2011, J. Phys. Chem. C, 115, 11920, 10.1021/jp201274g · DOI
  23. Sun, 2008, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 79, 389, 10.1007/s00253-008-1453-y · DOI
  24. Lang, 2007, Macromol. Biosci., 7, 144, 10.1002/mabi.200600235 · DOI
  25. Prozorov, 2013, Mater. Sci. Eng., R, 74, 133, 10.1016/j.mser.2013.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Bain, 2015, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 15508, 10.1039/C5CP00375J · DOI
  27. Eltayeb, 2013, Nanotechnology, 24, 465604, 10.1088/0957-4484/24/46/465604 · DOI
  28. Pareta, 2006, J. R. Soc. Interface, 3, 573, 10.1098/rsif.2006.0120 · DOI
  29. Stride, 2008, Soft Matter, 4, 2350, 10.1039/b809517p · DOI
  30. Maherani, 2011, Curr. Nanosci., 7, 436, 10.2174/157341311795542453 · DOI
  31. Guerin, 1992, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 58, 1102, 10.1128/AEM.58.4.1102-1109.1992 · DOI
  32. Gehl, 2003, Acta Physiol. Scand., 177, 437, 10.1046/j.1365-201X.2003.01093.x · DOI
  33. Bain, 2015, Nat. Sci. Rep., 5, 14311, 10.1038/srep14311 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Neumann, 1998, Biophys. J., 74, 98, 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77771-9 · DOI
  35. Ahn, 2012, J. Phys. Chem. C, 116, 6069, 10.1021/jp211843g · DOI
  36. Bazylinski, 2004, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 2, 217, 10.1038/nrmicro842 · DOI
  37. Rahman, 2011, Nanomaterials, 43, 10.5772/1371 · DOI
  38. Samiullah, 1995, Phys. Rev. B, 51, 10352, 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.10352 · DOI
  39. Zhang, 2011, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 77, 5851, 10.1128/AEM.05962-11 · DOI
  40. Luo, 2012, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 4708, 10.1039/c2cs35083a · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 10

Metadata

Authors
Bakhshi, P. K., Bain, J., Gul, M. O., Stride, E., Edirisinghe, M., & Staniland, S. S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering; University College London, Roberts; Torrington Place London WC1E 7JE UK
  • Department of Chemistry; University of Sheffield; Brook Hill Sheffield S3 7HF UK
  • School of Pharmacy; Department of Pharmaceutics; University College London; 29/39 Brunswick Square London WC1N 1AX UK
  • Institute of Biomedical Engineering; University of Oxford; Old Road Campus, Research Building University of Oxford Oxford OX3 7DQ UK
Venue
Macromolecular Bioscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08-04
Volume
16
Issue
11
Pages
1555-1561
ISSN
1616-5187
DOI
10.1002/mabi.201600181
Cited by
10
References
0
Language
en
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Manufacturing Man-Made Magnetosomes: High-Throughput In Situ Synthesis of Biomimetic Magnetite Loaded Nanovesicles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mabi.201600181
The paper
Bakhshi, P. K., Bain, J., Gul, M. O., Stride, E., Edirisinghe, M., & Staniland, S. S. (2016). Manufacturing Man-Made Magnetosomes: High-Throughput In Situ Synthesis of Biomimetic Magnetite Loaded Nanovesicles. Macromolecular Bioscience. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201600181